|
||||
|
||||
Red Brain, Blue Brain: Evaluative Processes Differ in Democrats and RepublicansDarren M. SchreiberUniversity of Exeter; Department of Political Science Alan N. Simmonsaffiliation not provided to SSRN Christopher T. DawesUniversity of California, San Diego (UCSD) - Department of Political Science Taru Flaganaffiliation not provided to SSRN James H. Fowleraffiliation not provided to SSRN Martin P. Paulusaffiliation not provided to SSRN 2009 APSA 2009 Toronto Meeting Paper Abstract: We matched public voter records to 54 subjects who performed a risk-taking task during functional imaging. We find that Democrats and Republicans had significantly different patterns of brain activation during processing of risky decisions. Amygdala activations, associated with externally directed reactions to risk, are stronger in Republicans, while insula activations, associated with internally directed reactions to affective perceptions, are stronger in Democrats. These results suggest an internal vs. external difference in evaluative process that illuminates and resolves a discrepancy in the existing literature. This process-based approach to political partisanship is distinct from the policy-based approach that has dominated research for at least the past half century. In fact, a two parameter model of partisanship based on amygdala and insula activations achieves better accuracy in predicting whether someone is a Democrat or a Republican than a well established model in political science based on parental socialization of party identification.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 15 working papers seriesDate posted: August 13, 2009 ; Last revised: September 5, 2009Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.453 seconds