<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
  <title>Recent Top 10 Papers by Download for SSRN eJournal: LSN: Political Process (Topic)</title>
  <link>http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/JELJOUR_Results.cfm?form_name=journalBrowse&amp;journal_id=991638</link>
  <description>LSN: Political Process (Topic) SSRN content as of May       19, 2013</description>
  <language>en-us</language>
  <pubDate>{ts '2013-05-19 17:44:19'}</pubDate>
  <generator>SSRN RSS Generator 1.0</generator>
  <managingEditor>editor@ssrn.com</managingEditor>
  <webMaster>webmaster@ssrn.com</webMaster>
    
  <item>
	<title>1. Cultural Cognition and Legal Policy Punctuations in the Supreme Court&#39;s Gender Discrimination Cases</title>
	<link>http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2242942</link>
	<description><![CDATA[<a target="_blank" href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=508710">Robert R. Robinson</a><br />Total New Downloads: <a target="_blank" href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/topten/topTenResults.cfm?groupingId=991638&netorjrnl=jrnl">22</a> :: Theories of policy punctuation have had a profound impact on our understanding of the policy process, but 1) these theories have largely, though not completely, eschewed policy change by the courts, and 2) have significant work to do in identifying common conditions that make punctuation more likely.  In this paper, I advance both goals by examining legal policy punctuation in the treatment of gender discrimination by the Supreme Court in the 1970s.  In a variant of the policy subsystem ...]]></description>
	<guid>http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2242942</guid>
  </item>
  
  
</channel>
</rss>
