Disease-Based Limitations on Compulsory Licenses Under Articles 31 and 31bis

RESEARCH HANDBOOK ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW AND THE WTO, Carlos Correa, ed., Edward Elgar, 2009

Boston Univ. School of Law Working Paper No. 09-26

22 Pages Posted: 20 May 2009

Date Written: May 20, 2009

Abstract

Compulsory licensure is one of the flexibilities retained under TRIPS to permit countries to support public health while granting pharmaceutical patents. The United States Government appears to take the position that compulsory licensure and other TRIPS flexibilities must be limited to certain infectious diseases, namely AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria. These proposed limitations are not supported by the text of Articles 31 and 31bis of TRIPS or by the negotiating history of the Agreement. Introducing disease-based limitations would be unwise, as the developing world is undergoing a demographic transition, with increasing shares of its disease burden coming from non-infectious diseases. Public health calls for retaining TRIPS flexibilities in all categories of human need.

Keywords: compulsory license, TRIPS, pharmaceuticals, USTR, disease

JEL Classification: I18, K11, K33

Suggested Citation

Outterson, Kevin, Disease-Based Limitations on Compulsory Licenses Under Articles 31 and 31bis (May 20, 2009). RESEARCH HANDBOOK ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW AND THE WTO, Carlos Correa, ed., Edward Elgar, 2009, Boston Univ. School of Law Working Paper No. 09-26, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1407522

Kevin Outterson (Contact Author)

Boston University School of Law ( email )

765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
237
Abstract Views
2,074
Rank
236,385
PlumX Metrics