Neoliberal Instrument Choice

ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND U.S. CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY, David Driesen, ed., MIT Press, 2009

37 Pages Posted: 9 Sep 2008

See all articles by David M. Driesen

David M. Driesen

Syracuse University College of Law

Date Written: August 11, 2008

Abstract

This book chapter reviews the influence on economic thought about instrument choice and its influence upon United States climate change policy. It shows that the theory of instrument choice made a positive contribution to the United States policy arsenal by emphasizing the cost effectiveness advantages of emissions trading. But because of an ideological climate uncritically supportive of free markets prevailed during the period of U.S. failure to address climate change, the United States favored overly broad trading programs, both in terms of geography and scope. This posture had a large influence on the Kyoto Protocol, leading the world to adopt a structure that creates significant risks of losing emission reductions and less incentive for innovation than a more narrowly designed program would offer. The chapter highlights the tension between sound regulatory policy and maximization of cost savings, which broad design favors. This chapter forms part of a forthcoming book, edited by the author, evaluating economic thought's influence on United States climate change policy.

Keywords: emissions trading, economic incentives, Kyoto Protocol, climate change, cap and trade, instrument choice, innovation, regulatory design

JEL Classification: K32, I18

Suggested Citation

Driesen, David M., Neoliberal Instrument Choice (August 11, 2008). ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND U.S. CLIMATE CHANGE POLICY, David Driesen, ed., MIT Press, 2009 , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1218072

David M. Driesen (Contact Author)

Syracuse University College of Law ( email )

Dineen Hall
950 Irving Ave.
Syracuse, NY, NY 13244
United States
315-443-4218 (Phone)
315-443-4141 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.syr.edu/faculty/facultymember.asp?fac=12

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
167
Abstract Views
1,559
Rank
321,037
PlumX Metrics