Innovation Subsidies: Does the Funding Source Matter for Innovation Intensity and Performance? Empirical Evidence from Germany
43 Pages Posted: 14 Feb 2012
There are 2 versions of this paper
Innovation Subsidies: Does the Funding Source Matter for Innovation Intensity and Performance? Empirical Evidence from Germany
Date Written: July 1, 2011
Abstract
Applying a variant of a non-parametric matching estimator, we consider European funding and national funding as heterogeneous treatments, distinguishing and simultaneously analyzing the effect these treatments have on innovation input and performance. In terms of input, getting funding from both sources yields the highest impact. If funding from only one source is received, EU grants have higher effects. In terms of output, holding innovation expenditures constant, funding from both sources display higher sales of market novelties and future patent applications at the firm level. If only one grant is obtained, we find superiority for national funding.
Keywords: Subsidies, Innovation, Policy Evaluation, Treatment Effects, Nonparametric matching estimation
JEL Classification: C14, H50, O38
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Is Public R&D a Complement or Substitute for Private R&D? A Review of the Econometric Evidence
By Paul A. David, Bronwyn H. Hall, ...
-
The Impact of Corporate Restructuring on Industrial Research and Development
-
How Effective are Fiscal Incentives for R&D? a New Review of the Evidence
By Bronwyn H. Hall and John Van Reenen
-
An Empirical Evaluation of the Effects of R&D Subsidies
By Isabel Busom
-
Does Government R&D Policy Mainly Benefit Scientists and Engineers?
-
Do R&D Subsidies Stimulate or Displace Private R&D? Evidence from Israel
By Saul Lach
-
Public R&D Policies and Cost Behavior of the Us Manufacturing Industries