The Myth of the Customary Law Merchant

54 Pages Posted: 22 Apr 2012

Date Written: April 21, 2012

Abstract

Legal scholars from many disciplines — including law and economics, commercial law, and cyber law — have for decades clung to the story of the so-called law merchant as unassailable proof that private ordering can work. According to this story, medieval merchants created a perfect private legal system out of commercial customs. As this customary law was uniformly and universally adopted across Europe, it facilitated international trade. The law merchant myth is false on many levels, but this Article takes aim at two of its fundamental principles: that uniform and universal customary merchant law could have existed and that merchants needed it to exist. The Article argues that the most widespread aspects of commercial law arose from contract and statute rather than custom. What custom the merchants applied often did not become uniform and universal because custom usually could not be transplanted and remain the same from place to place. Yet, the use of local custom did not hamper international trade because intermediaries such as brokers ensured that medieval merchants had no need for a transnational law.

Suggested Citation

Kadens, Emily, The Myth of the Customary Law Merchant (April 21, 2012). Texas Law Review, Vol. 90, 2012, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2043550

Emily Kadens (Contact Author)

Northwestern University School of Law ( email )

600 North Lake Shore Drive
Chicago, IL 60601
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,022
Abstract Views
4,653
Rank
40,529
PlumX Metrics