The Costs and Benefits of Fiscal Rules: Evidence from U.S. States
16 Pages Posted: 27 Jun 2000 Last revised: 5 Nov 2022
Date Written: June 1996
Abstract
This paper shows that in American states balanced budget rules are effective in enforcing fiscal discipline but they have no costs in terms of increased output variability. More specifically, we show that tighter fiscal rules are associated with larger average surplus and lower cyclical variability of the budget balance. However, the lower flexibility of the budget balance does not affect state output variability.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Budget Institutions and Fiscal Performance in Latin America
By Alberto F. Alesina, Ricardo Hausmann, ...
-
Comparative Politics and Public Finance
By Torsten Persson, Gérard Roland, ...
-
Separation of Powers and Accountability: Towards a Formal Approach to Comparative Politics
By Torsten Persson, Gérard Roland, ...
-
The Size and Scope of Government: Comparative Politics with Rational Politicians
By Torsten Persson and Guido Tabellini
-
Endogenous Political Institutions
By Philippe Aghion, Alberto F. Alesina, ...
-
Endogenous Political Institutions
By Philippe Aghion, Alberto F. Alesina, ...
-
Endogenous Political Institutions
By Philippe Aghion, Alberto F. Alesina, ...
-
Budget Institutions and Fiscal Performance in Latin America
By Alberto F. Alesina, Ricardo Hausmann, ...