Did Bank Distress Stifle Innovation During the Great Depression?
47 Pages Posted: 25 Aug 2014 Last revised: 22 Mar 2023
Date Written: August 2014
Abstract
We find a negative relationship between bank distress and the level, quality and trajectory of firm-level innovation during the Great Depression, particularly for R&D firms operating in capital intensive industries. However, we also show that because a sufficient number of R&D intensive firms were located in counties with lower levels of bank distress, or were operating in less capital intensive industries, the negative effects were mitigated in aggregate. Although Depression era bank distress was associated with the stifling of innovation, our results also help to explain why technological development was still robust following one of the largest shocks in the history of the U.S. banking system.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Systemic Risk and Stability in Financial Networks
By Daron Acemoglu, Asuman E. Ozdaglar, ...
-
Systemic Risk and Stability in Financial Networks
By Daron Acemoglu, Asuman E. Ozdaglar, ...
-
Innovation, Reallocation and Growth
By Daron Acemoglu, Ufuk Akcigit, ...
-
Growth Through Heterogeneous Innovations
By Ufuk Akcigit and William Kerr
-
Growth Through Heterogeneous Innovations
By Ufuk Akcigit and William Kerr
-
Growth Through Heterogeneous Innovations
By Ufuk Akcigit and William Kerr
-
Growth Through Heterogeneous Innovations
By Ufuk Akcigit and William Kerr
-
Growth Through Heterogeneous Innovations
By Ufuk Akcigit and William Kerr
-
Innovation by Entrants and Incumbents
By Daron Acemoglu and Dan Cao
-
Innovation by Entrants and Incumbents
By Daron Acemoglu and Dan Cao