Democratizing the WTO

29 Pages Posted: 14 Oct 2001

See all articles by Jeffery Atik

Jeffery Atik

Loyola Law School Los Angeles

Abstract

As the WTO accretes power, challenges to its authority will only increase. The phrase "democracy deficit" has been used in different literatures, as applied to different institutions, to express a structural isolation from popular input. It is often, though not always, used as a critique. The WTO is afflicted with at least three forms of "democracy deficit:"

1. Supranationalism. The WTO receives no direct democratic input; rather WTO policies and authority are determined, through various means, by its member states.

2. Judicial lawmaking. Much WTO lawmaking occurs in the context of dispute resolution. Dispute panelists, like judges, are isolated from ordinary politics. The WTO Dispute Settlement Body enjoys a form of judicial supremacy that is democratically suspect, particularly since there is no legislative check on Dispute Settlement Body activism.

3. Political capture. Foreign relations generally, and especially international trade policy, are more subject to capture by special interests than is domestic policy. This undercuts the likelihood that national governments will adequately transmit the concerns and values of their people. Institutions such as Fast Track suspend ordinary democratic processes in the international trade area.

Suggested Citation

Atik, Jeffery, Democratizing the WTO. Loyola-LA, Public Law Research Paper No. 2001-1, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=250331 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.250331

Jeffery Atik (Contact Author)

Loyola Law School Los Angeles ( email )

919 Albany Street
Los Angeles, CA 90015-1211
United States
213-736-8369 (Phone)
213-380-3769 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
797
Abstract Views
3,818
Rank
57,373
PlumX Metrics