Significance of Log-Periodic Precursors to Financial Crashes
38 Pages Posted: 25 Jul 2001
There are 2 versions of this paper
Significance of Log-Periodic Precursors to Financial Crashes
Date Written: June 2001
Abstract
We clarify the status of log-periodicity associated with speculative bubbles preceding financial crashes. In particular, we address Feigenbaum's [2001] criticism and show how it can be rebuked. Feigenbaum's main result is as follows: "the hypothesis that the log-periodic component is present in the data cannot be rejected at the 95% confidence level when using all the data prior to the 1987 crash; however, it can be rejected by removing the last year of data." (e.g., by removing 15% of the data closest to the critical point). We stress that it is naive to analyze a critical point phenomenon, i.e., a power law divergence, reliably by removing the most important part of the data closest to the critical point. We also present the history of log-periodicity in the present context explaining its essential features and why it may be important. We offer an extension of the rational expectation bubble model for general and arbitrary risk-aversion within the general stochastic discount factor theory. We suggest guidelines for using log-periodicity and explain how to develop and interpret statistical tests of log-periodicity. We discuss the issue of prediction based on our results and the evidence of outliers in the distribution of drawdowns. New statistical tests demonstrate that the 1% to 10% quantile of the largest events of the population of drawdowns of the Nasdaq composite index and of the Dow Jones Industrial Average index belong to a distribution significantly different from the rest of the population. This suggests that very large drawdowns result from an amplification mechanism that may make them more predictable than smaller market moves.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Large Stock Market Price Drawdowns are Outliers
By Anders Johansen and Didier Sornette
-
On Rational Bubbles and Fat Tails
By Thomas Lux and Didier Sornette
-
Endogenous Versus Exogenous Crashes in Financial Markets
By Anders Johansen and Didier Sornette
-
By Anders Johansen and Didier Sornette
-
2000-2003 Real Estate Bubble in the UK But Not in the USA
By Wei-xing Zhou and Didier Sornette
-
Financial Bubbles, Real Estate Bubbles, Derivative Bubbles, and the Financial and Economic Crisis
By Didier Sornette and Ryan Woodard
-
Financial Bubbles, Real Estate Bubbles, Derivative Bubbles, and the Financial and Economic Crisis
By Didier Sornette and Ryan Woodard
-
Empirical Distributions of Log-Returns: Between the Stretched Exponential and the Power Law?
By Yannick Malevergne, Vladilen Pisarenko, ...
-
By Didier Sornette and Wei-xing Zhou