Discounts on Illiquid Stocks: Evidence from China

44 Pages Posted: 14 Oct 2001

See all articles by Zhiwu Chen

Zhiwu Chen

University of Hong Kong, Faculty of Business Economics (HKU Business School); Asia Global Institute, University of Hong Kong

Peng Xiong

Beijing University

Date Written: September 2001

Abstract

This paper provides evidence on the significant impact of illiquidity or non-marketability on security valuation. A typical listed company in China has several types of share outstanding: (i) common shares that are only tradable on stock exchanges, (ii) restricted institutional shares (RIS) that are not tradable and can only be tansferred privately or through irregularly scheduled auctions, and (iii) state shares that are only transferable privately. These types of share are indentical in every aspect, except that market regulations make state and RIS shares almost totally illiquid. Our analysis focuses on the price differences between RIS and common shares of the same company, using both auction and private-transfer transactions for RIS shares. Among our findings, the average discount for RIS shares relative to their floating counterpart is 77.93% and 85.59%, respectively based on auction and private transfers. The price for illiquidity is thus high, significantly raising the cost of equity capital. This illiquidity discount increases with both the floating shares' volatility and the firm's debt/ equity ratio, but decreases with firm size, return on equity, and book/price and earnings/price ratios (based on the floating share price). However, RIS share price can either increase or decrease with the quantity being transacted, depending on whether it is through a private placement or an auction.

JEL Classification: G10, G12, G14, G15, G18, G34

Suggested Citation

Chen, Zhiwu and Xiong, Peng, Discounts on Illiquid Stocks: Evidence from China (September 2001). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=286169 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.286169

Zhiwu Chen (Contact Author)

University of Hong Kong, Faculty of Business Economics (HKU Business School) ( email )

Pokfulam Road
Hong Kong
Hong Kong

Asia Global Institute, University of Hong Kong ( email )

Room 328-348, Main Building
The University of Hong Kong
Pokfulam
Hong Kong

Peng Xiong

Beijing University ( email )

China Center for Economic Research (CCER)
Beijing
China

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
2,525
Abstract Views
13,582
Rank
10,366
PlumX Metrics