Why are Put Options so Expensive?

Quarterly Journal of Finance, Vol. 4, 1450015 [50 pages], 2014

40 Pages Posted: 29 Apr 2003 Last revised: 6 Apr 2015

See all articles by Oleg Bondarenko

Oleg Bondarenko

University of Illinois at Chicago - Department of Finance

Date Written: April 1, 2003

Abstract

This paper studies the "overpriced puts puzzle'' -- the finding that historical prices of the S&P 500 put options have been too high and incompatible with the canonical asset-pricing models, such as CAPM and Rubinstein (1976) model. To investigate whether put returns could be rationalized by another, possibly nonstandard equilibrium model, we implement the model-free methodology of Bondarenko (2003a). The methodology requires no parametric assumptions on investors' preferences. Furthermore, it can be applied even when the sample is affected by certain selection biases (such as the Peso problem) and when investors' beliefs are incorrect. The main finding of the paper is that no model within a studied class of models can possibly explain the put anomaly.

Keywords: Market Market Efficiency Hypothesis, Rational Learning, Option Valuation, Risk-Neutral Density, Peso Problem

JEL Classification: G12, G13, G14

Suggested Citation

Bondarenko, Oleg, Why are Put Options so Expensive? (April 1, 2003). Quarterly Journal of Finance, Vol. 4, 1450015 [50 pages], 2014, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=375784 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.375784

Oleg Bondarenko (Contact Author)

University of Illinois at Chicago - Department of Finance ( email )

2431 University Hall (UH)
601 S. Morgan Street
Chicago, IL 60607-7124
United States
(312) 996-2362 (Phone)
(312) 413-7948 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
6,326
Abstract Views
22,833
Rank
2,221
PlumX Metrics