Will Job Testing Harm Minority Workers?
56 Pages Posted: 30 Sep 2004 Last revised: 30 Nov 2022
There are 2 versions of this paper
Date Written: September 2004
Abstract
Because minorities typically fare poorly on standardized tests, job testing is thought to pose an equity-efficiency trade-off: testing improves selection but reduces minority hiring. We develop a conceptual framework to assess when this tradeoff is likely to apply and evaluate the evidence for such a trade-off using data from a national retail firm whose 1,363 stores switched from informal to test-based worker screening over the course of on year. We document that testing yielded more productive hires at this firm -- raising median tenure by 10-plus percent. Consistent with prior research, minorities performed worse on the test. Yet, testing had no measurable impact on minority hiring, and productivity gains were uniformly large among minorities and non-minorities. These results suggest that job testing raised the precision of screening without introducing additional negative information about minority applicants, most plausibly because both the job test and the informal screen that preceded it were unbiased.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Employer Learning, Statistical Discrimination and Occupational Attainment
-
By Henry S. Farber and Robert S. Gibbons
-
Comparative Advantage, Learning, and Sectoral Wage Determination
By Robert S. Gibbons, Lawrence F. Katz, ...
-
Testing Theories of Discrimination: Evidence from "Weakest Link"
-
Dispersion in the Economic Return to Schooling
By Colm P. Harmon, Vincent Hogan, ...
-
Does Education Raise Productivity or Just Reflect it?
By Arnaud Chevalier, Colm P. Harmon, ...