Measurement Error, Legalized Abortion, and the Decline in Crime: A Response to Foote and Goetz (2005)
21 Pages Posted: 20 Apr 2006 Last revised: 3 Oct 2022
Date Written: January 2006
Abstract
Donohue and Levitt (2001) argue that the legalization of abortion in the United States in the 1970s played an important role in explaining the observed decline in crime approximately two decades later. Foote and Goetz (2005) challenge the results presented in one of the tables in that original paper. In this reply, we regretfully acknowledge the omission of state-year interactions in the published version of that table, but show that their inclusion does not alter the qualitative results (or their statistical significance), although it does reduce the magnitude of the estimates. When one uses a more carefully constructed measure of abortion (e.g. one that takes into account cross-state mobility, or doing a better job of matching dates of birth to abortion exposure), however, the evidence in support of the abortion-crime hypothesis is as strong or stronger than suggested in our original work.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The Power of the Pill: Oral Contraceptives and Women's Career and Marriage Decisions
By Claudia Goldin and Lawrence F. Katz
-
The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime
By John J. Donohue and Steven D. Levitt
-
The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime
By John J. Donohue and Steven D. Levitt
-
Roe V. Wade and American Fertility
By Phillip B. Levine, Douglas Staiger, ...
-
After the Epidemic: Recent Trends in Youth Violence in the United States
By Philip J. Cook and John H. Laub
-
Abortion Legalization and Child Living Circumstances: Who is the "Marginal Child?"
By Jonathan Gruber, Phillip B. Levine, ...
-
Unobservables, Pregnancy Resolutions, and Birthweight Production Functions in New York City
By Michael Grossman and Theodore Joyce
-
Schooling and Labor Market Consequences of the 1970 State Abortion Reforms