Nafta Meets the American Torts Process: O'Keefe V. Loewen
31 Pages Posted: 28 May 2001 Last revised: 9 Nov 2007
Abstract
The systematic bias against out-of-state defendants in American tort law is acutely illustrated in the important Mississippi case, O'Keefe v Loewen. This case, which resulted in the bankruptcy of the Canadian defendant, has itself become an international cause celebre because of the NAFTA challenge it has spawned. In this article, the factual backdrop of the case is described, the NAFTA challenge analyzed, and the implications of the challenge for tort reform are discussed.
Keywords: NAFTA, O'Keefe, Loewen, out-of-state defendants, tort reform
JEL Classification: K13
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Krauss, Michael I., Nafta Meets the American Torts Process: O'Keefe V. Loewen. George Mason Law Review, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 69-98, Fall 2000, George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 07-39, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=271265
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.