Testimony on the Regulation of Indian Gaming, Oversight Hearing on Indian Gaming, before the United States Senate, Committee on Indian Affairs, 109th Congress, 1st Session (September 21, 2005)

6 Pages Posted: 20 Nov 2007 Last revised: 20 Oct 2017

Abstract

Federal and tribal regulation is likely to be more successful than state regulation of Indian gaming because tribal governments and the federal government have a greater interest in the long term success of Indian gaming. Uniform federal minimum internal control standards can protect the integrity of the Indian gaming industry nationwide. While federal regulators should exercise a powerful role, they must be respectful of tribal governments.

Keywords: Indain Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988, National Indian Gaming Commission, Gaming, Gambling, Indian gaming, NIGC, IGRA, Indian law, Indian tribes, American Indians, Native Americans

JEL Classification: L83

Suggested Citation

Washburn, Kevin K., Testimony on the Regulation of Indian Gaming, Oversight Hearing on Indian Gaming, before the United States Senate, Committee on Indian Affairs, 109th Congress, 1st Session (September 21, 2005). Minnesota Legal Studies Research Paper No. 07-50, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1030924 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1030924

Kevin K. Washburn (Contact Author)

University of Iowa College of Law ( email )

Melrose and Byington
Iowa City, IA 52242
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
114
Abstract Views
1,680
Rank
436,129
PlumX Metrics