'Law and Finance' Revisited

52 Pages Posted: 21 Feb 2008 Last revised: 30 Jul 2009

Date Written: February 1, 2008

Abstract

The Antidirector Rights Index from La Porta et al.'s Law and Finance (1998) has been used as a measure of shareholder protection in almost 100 published studies. With articles by legal scholars questioning the accuracy of index values for several countries, I undertake a systematic study to verify these values for 46 countries with the help of local lawyers. My emphasis is on accuracy of the data; I do not change the original variable definitions. The study leads to a substantial revision: 33 of the 46 observations need to be corrected, and the correlation of corrected and original values is only .53. With accurate values, the well-known results of La Porta et al. (1997, 1998) no longer hold: accurate index values are neither distributed with significant differences between Common and Civil Law countries nor correlated with stock market size and ownership dispersion. All of the many results derived with the index will have to be revisited.

Keywords: legal origin, law and finance, ADRI

JEL Classification: G38, K22, P48

Suggested Citation

Spamann, Holger, 'Law and Finance' Revisited (February 1, 2008). Harvard Law School John M. Olin Center Discussion Paper No. 12, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1095526 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1095526

Holger Spamann (Contact Author)

Harvard Law School ( email )

Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

ECGI ( email )

c/o the Royal Academies of Belgium
Rue Ducale 1 Hertogsstraat
1000 Brussels
Belgium

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
2,034
Abstract Views
9,281
Rank
14,563
PlumX Metrics