Is Military Law Relevant to the 'Evolving Standards of Decency' Embodied in the Eighth Amendment?

8 Pages Posted: 13 Sep 2008 Last revised: 2 Oct 2008

Date Written: September 12, 2008

Abstract

On June 25, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issued an opinion in Kennedy v. Louisiana holding that the application of the death penalty to the crime of aggravated child rape violated the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Three days after the opinion was issued, it was discovered that everyone involved in the case had overlooked a 2006 amendment to the Uniform Code of Military Justice ("UCMJ") that made child rape a death penalty offense. This seeming oversight by the majority led the state of Louisiana and Solicitor General to petition the Court for the case to be reheard. On September 8, the Supreme Court took the highly unusual step of asking for more briefing on whether the case should be reheard. This short article contends that for the Court to grant rehearing based upon the rationales embodied in the Louisiana and Solicitor General's briefs would represent a substantial departure from past Court practice and be contrary to the special treatment that military law has historically received. A careful review of the Court's prior opinions shows that the Court has never considered military law in evaluating the objective indicia of the "evolving standards of decency" even when the military had seemingly relevant provisions. This practice by the Court is almost surely due to its recognition that when Congress amends military law, it only represents a national consensus as to military policy and not civilian policy. As a result, the Supreme Court should not rehear the Kennedy case based upon the majority opinion's omission of the 2006 UCMJ amendment.

Keywords: Death Penalty, Capital Punishment, Rape, Child Molestation, Supreme Court, Military Law, UCMJ

Suggested Citation

Yung, Corey Rayburn, Is Military Law Relevant to the 'Evolving Standards of Decency' Embodied in the Eighth Amendment? (September 12, 2008). Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy, Vol. 103, 2008, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1267450

Corey Rayburn Yung (Contact Author)

University of Kansas School of Law ( email )

Green Hall
1535 W. 15th Street
Lawrence, KS 66045-7577
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
206
Abstract Views
3,492
Rank
267,444
PlumX Metrics