Contracting Frictions and Cross-Border Capital Flows: Evidence from Venture Capital
36 Pages Posted: 19 Feb 2009
There are 2 versions of this paper
Contracting Frictions and Cross-Border Capital Flows: Evidence from Venture Capital
Date Written: November 2008
Abstract
Analyzing a large sample of cross-border investments by U.S. venture capital firms, we find that average round sizes and the fraction of financing raised in the first round are larger for companies in countries with poorer legal enforcement. This evidence, which is consistent with third-best contracting where investors take larger stakes to mitigate contractual enforcement problems, suggests that the staging of investments in weak enforcement countries may be less than an optimal. We develop a contracting friction measure, based on the degree of sub-optimal staging, and find that it is negatively related to aggregate cross-border venture capital flows. We interpret the evidence as consistent with a "staging channel" through which frictions that lead to third-best contracting and sub-optimal staging limit cross-border investment.
Keywords: Venture capital, cross-border, contracting
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By Steven N. Kaplan and Per Strömberg
-
By Steven N. Kaplan and Per Strömberg
-
Venture Capital and the Structure of Capital Markets: Banks Versus Stock Markets
By Ronald J. Gilson and Bernard S. Black
-
Money Chasing Deals?: The Impact of Fund Inflows on Private Equity Valuations
By Paul A. Gompers and Josh Lerner
-
Private Equity Performance: Returns, Persistence and Capital Flows
-
Private Equity Performance: Returns, Persistence and Capital
-
The Returns to Entrepreneurial Investment: A Private Equity Premium Puzzle?
-
Venture Capital and the Professionalization of Start-Up Firms: Empirical Evidence
By Thomas F. Hellmann and Manju Puri