European Commission - White Paper: Damages Actions for Breach of the EC Antitrust Rules

IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 39, No. 7, 2008

Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property, Competition & Tax Law Research Paper No. 09-07

13 Pages Posted: 29 Jul 2009

See all articles by Josef Drexl

Josef Drexl

Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition; Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU)

Beatriz Conde

Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition

Stefan Enchelmaier

Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property, Competition and Tax Law

Mark-Oliver Mackenrodt

Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition

Rupprecht Podszun

Heinrich Heine University Dusseldorf - Faculty of Law

Date Written: October 31, 2008

Abstract

This contribution represents the comments of the Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property, Competition and Tax Law, Munich (Germany), on the DG Competition White Paper of April 2008 on damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules. The White Paper forms part of the European Commission’s strategy of enhancing private enforcement of European competition law through damage claims. The White Paper was preceded by several comparative reports and a by Green Paper. It is likely that it will form the basis for future policy instruments in the field of private enforcement.

The present contribution discusses some recurring issues of private antitrust enforcement in Europe. It proceeds to analyse eight specific legal issues that the White Paper had put forward for public comment: standing of indirect purchasers and collective redress; access to evidence; binding effect, across Member States’ borders, of decisions adopted by national competition authorities; the fault requirement as a prerequisite to civil liability; definition and quantification of damages; the passing-on defence; limitation periods; costs of damages actions; and, finally, the interaction between leniency programs and actions for damages. The paper advocates excluding the passing-on defence, and instead implementing a separate mechanism for dividing the overcharge between purchasers on different levels of the distribution chain. Overall, we welcome the proposal to give private damage claims a more prominent role as an instrument for enforcing the competition rules in Europe. Nevertheless, the enforcement of the widely harmonised European competition rules by means of national rules on civil procedure might create tensions with traditional legal principles in some Member States.

Keywords: private enforcement, European competition law, antitrust, damages, civil liability, standing of indirect purchasers, collective redress, access to evidence, passing-on defence, limitation periods

Suggested Citation

Drexl, Josef and Conde, Beatriz and Enchelmaier, Stefan and Mackenrodt, Mark-Oliver and Podszun, Rupprecht, European Commission - White Paper: Damages Actions for Breach of the EC Antitrust Rules (October 31, 2008). IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, Vol. 39, No. 7, 2008, Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property, Competition & Tax Law Research Paper No. 09-07, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1432330 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1432330

Josef Drexl

Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition ( email )

Marstallplatz 1
Munich, Bayern 80539
Germany

HOME PAGE: http://www.ip.mpg.de

Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich (LMU)

Munich, 80539
Germany

Beatriz Conde

Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition ( email )

Marstallplatz 1
Munich, Bayern 80539
Germany

Stefan Enchelmaier

Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property, Competition and Tax Law

Marstallplatz 1
Munich, Bayern 80539
Germany

Mark-Oliver Mackenrodt (Contact Author)

Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition ( email )

Marstallplatz 1
Munich, Bayern 80539
Germany

Rupprecht Podszun

Heinrich Heine University Dusseldorf - Faculty of Law

Universitätsstr. 1
Düsseldorf, D-40225
Germany

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
644
Abstract Views
4,676
Rank
75,800
PlumX Metrics