Differences between Politically Connected and Non-Connected Firms: A Cross Country Analysis
35 Pages Posted: 24 Jul 2006 Last revised: 5 Aug 2009
Date Written: August 3, 2009
Abstract
Evidence from firms in 47 countries shows that companies with political connections have higher leverage and higher market shares, but they underperform compared to non-connected companies on an accounting basis. Differences between connected and unconnected firms are more pronounced when political links are stronger. Differences also vary depending on the level of corruption and the degree of economic development in individual countries.
Keywords: Political connections, leverage, benefits
JEL Classification: D72, F39, G28, G3
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By Mara Faccio
-
Cronyism and Capital Controls: Evidence from Malaysia
By Simon Johnson and Todd Mitton
-
Cronyism and Capital Controls: Evidence from Malaysia
By Simon Johnson and Todd Mitton
-
Do Lenders Favor Politically Connected Firms? Rent Provision in an Emerging Financial Market
By Atif R. Mian and Asim Ijaz Khwaja
-
Political Connections and Corporate Bailouts
By Mara Faccio, Ronald W. Masulis, ...
-
Institutions, Ownership, and Finance: The Determinants of Profit Reinvestment Among Chinese Firms
By Robert Cull and Lixin Colin Xu
-
The East Asia Crisis and Corporate Finances: The Untold Micro Story
-
Political Connections and Preferential Access to Finance: The Role of Campaign Contributions
By Stijn Claessens, Erik Feyen, ...
-
Political Connections and Preferential Access to Finance: The Role of Campaign Contributions
By Stijn Claessens, Erik Feyen, ...