The Roots of Printz: Proslavery Constitutionalism, National Law Enforcement, Federalism, and Local Cooperation

21 Pages Posted: 13 Aug 2009

See all articles by Paul Finkelman

Paul Finkelman

Gratz College; Albany Law School

Date Written: 2004

Abstract

This article is about federal statutes that conscript state officials and how Congress should be required to carry out the laws. In Printz, the Solicitor General and Justice Scalia invoked the Fugitive Slave Law of 1793 to support a legal proposition, though the analyses were both unlikely and incorrect. This article offers a history of the Fugitive Slave Law and Prigg v. Pennsylvania to illustrate the problems with relying on state officials to implement and enforce federal policy, and the state personal liberty laws that undermined the federal laws’ effectiveness.

Keywords: federal statutes, fugitive slave law

Suggested Citation

Finkelman, Paul, The Roots of Printz: Proslavery Constitutionalism, National Law Enforcement, Federalism, and Local Cooperation (2004). Brooklyn Law Review, Vol. 69, 2004, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1447489

Paul Finkelman (Contact Author)

Gratz College ( email )

7605 Old York Road
Melrose Park, PA 19027
United States

Albany Law School

NY
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
86
Abstract Views
900
Rank
531,713
PlumX Metrics