Critical Corporate Governance and the Demise of the Ultra Vires Doctrine

Warwick School of Law Research Paper

Final article in Common Law World Review, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2009

36 Pages Posted: 18 Nov 2009 Last revised: 30 Nov 2009

See all articles by Lorraine E. Talbot

Lorraine E. Talbot

University of York - York Law School; University of Birmingham - Birmingham Law School

Date Written: April 29, 2009

Abstract

Using a contextual approach this article assesses the corporate governance implications of the historical demise of the ultra vires doctrine from its muscular assertion in Ashbury through to the Companies Act 2006. It demonstrates that the strict approach in Ashbury was designed to empower outsider shareholders in companies where ownership was becoming separate from control but that paradoxically this approach was reversed as separation became more complete with increased share dispersal. The subsequent enhancement of insider (but minority) investor and management power, demonstrated in both England and the United States, raises questions as to why ultra vires has not been protected and bolstered by successive governments. It concludes that the demise of ultra vires is indicative of a bias in company law and government policy in favour of an elite group of controlling shareholders.

Keywords: corporate governance, ultra vires, history, power

Suggested Citation

Talbot, Lorraine E., Critical Corporate Governance and the Demise of the Ultra Vires Doctrine (April 29, 2009). Warwick School of Law Research Paper, Final article in Common Law World Review, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2009, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1396588

Lorraine E. Talbot (Contact Author)

University of York - York Law School

York YO10
United Kingdom

University of Birmingham - Birmingham Law School ( email )

Edgbaston
Birmingham, AL B15 2TT
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,027
Abstract Views
4,126
Rank
40,869
PlumX Metrics