Legal Realism in Action: Indirect Copyright Liability's Continuing Tort Framework and Sony's De Facto Demise

63 Pages Posted: 1 Mar 2007 Last revised: 16 Jan 2012

See all articles by Peter S. Menell

Peter S. Menell

UC Berkeley School of Law

David Nimmer

Irell & Manella LLP

Date Written: February 28, 2007

Abstract

The Supreme Court's indirect copyright liability standard, derived in Sony Corporation of America v. Universal City Studios from patent law and reasserted in Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd., is widely seen as creating a safe harbor for distributors of dual use technologies. Yet, when one looks to cases decided since Sony, legislative enactments, and the decisions of technology companies in the marketplace, a very different reality emerges. This article explores and explains the broad gulf between the idealized (and idolized) Sony safe harbor and the practical reality. It shows that the law in many respects reflects the tort principles that undergird copyright liability more generally.

Keywords: Copyright, Contributory Liability, Indirect Liability

JEL Classification: O34, Z10, K30

Suggested Citation

Menell, Peter S. and Nimmer, David, Legal Realism in Action: Indirect Copyright Liability's Continuing Tort Framework and Sony's De Facto Demise (February 28, 2007). UCLA Law Review, Vol. 55, p. 143, 2007, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=966380 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.966380

Peter S. Menell (Contact Author)

UC Berkeley School of Law ( email )

2240 Bancroft Way
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States

David Nimmer

Irell & Manella LLP ( email )

1800 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 900
Los Angeles, CA 90067
United States
310-277-1010 or (310) 203-7079 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
399
Abstract Views
3,141
Rank
136,737
PlumX Metrics