Conflict of Laws and Choice of Law
19 Pages Posted: 4 Nov 2009
Date Written: November 3, 2009
Abstract
In this revised entry for a new edition of Elgar’s Encyclopedia of Law and Economics we discuss the law and economics of conflict of laws and choice of law, focusing on the law in the US. We first consider choice of law when the parties have not effectively chosen their governing law by contract. We address four questions: (1) Why do courts ever apply anything other than the law of the forum? (2) If a court sometimes applies foreign law, is a rule-based or more modern standard-based approach to its choice preferable? (3) Why have so many states abandoned rule-based approaches in favor of standard-based ones? and (4) Is there any real practical difference between the First Restatement and modern approaches? We then discuss costs and benefits of enforcing parties’ contractual choice of law provisions. We conclude that permitting parties to choose the governing law that best fits their transactions and future private disputes can enhance jurisdictional competition and help restore predictability to the conflict of laws problem. When states nevertheless wish to insist on the application of their own governing law, they should state that explicitly in statutes.
Keywords: Conflict of Laws, Choice of Law, Private International Law
JEL Classification: K33
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Statutes' Domains in Private International Law: An Economic Theory of the Limits of Mandatory Rules
By Michael J. Whincop and Mary Keyes
-
Default Rules from Mandatory Rules: Privatizing Law Through Arbitration