The Last Bankrupt Hanged: Balancing Incentives in the Development of Bankruptcy Law

91 Pages Posted: 13 Aug 2009 Last revised: 19 Jul 2010

Date Written: August 10, 2009

Abstract

This paper frames the history of the Anglo-American bankruptcy tradition as a search for solutions to the basic problem that has from the first underlain the bankruptcy process: how to obtain the assistance of the debtor in his financial dismantling. The pivotal moment in this story came in the years 1705-1706, when the English Parliament drafted a bill making the bankrupt’s refusal to cooperate with the commissioners running his bankruptcy a capital crime. Almost as an afterthought, they also introduced discharge of debt. Incentivizing cooperation with discharge, of course, would have a fruitful future. Coercing the debtor to be honest, however, proved a failure. Fraud flourished, and few perpetrators were executed, in part because creditors and jurors found putting bankrupts to death a bit excessive. And yet, despite the failure of the English experiment with harsh penalties, the desire to punish debtors has remained a part of the culture of bankruptcy to this day.

Keywords: capital punishment, bankruptcy, legal history

Suggested Citation

Kadens, Emily, The Last Bankrupt Hanged: Balancing Incentives in the Development of Bankruptcy Law (August 10, 2009). Duke Law Journal, Vol. 59, No. 7, April 2010, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1446818

Emily Kadens (Contact Author)

Northwestern University School of Law ( email )

600 North Lake Shore Drive
Chicago, IL 60601
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
279
Abstract Views
1,681
Rank
201,040
PlumX Metrics