Debunking the Socratic Method?: Not So Fast, My Friend!

Phoenix Law Review, Vol. 3, p. 351, 2010

14 Pages Posted: 18 Dec 2010 Last revised: 16 Dec 2012

See all articles by Daniel J. Dye

Daniel J. Dye

St. Mary's University School of Law

Date Written: August 18, 2010

Abstract

This is a response to Professor Scott Taylor's assertion that the problem method should replace the Socratic case-method in legal education. I argue that Professor Taylor's call to abandon the Socratic method, while understandable, goes too far. I believe (and argue) that delivering useful legal education via the Socratic method is not only possible, but can be done well. The Socratic method is simply a tool whose results depend on its proper application.

Keywords: Socratic Method, Problem Method, Legal Education

JEL Classification: I21

Suggested Citation

Dye, Daniel J., Debunking the Socratic Method?: Not So Fast, My Friend! (August 18, 2010). Phoenix Law Review, Vol. 3, p. 351, 2010, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1727949

Daniel J. Dye (Contact Author)

St. Mary's University School of Law ( email )

One Camino Santa Maria
San Antonio, TX 78228
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
86
Abstract Views
715
Rank
531,713
PlumX Metrics