Coding the Dictatorship of ‘the They:’ A Phenomenological Critique of Digital Rights Management

in Ethics and Phenomenology, eds. Mark Sanders and Jeremy Wisnewski (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2012), 197-219

30 Pages Posted: 1 Feb 2011 Last revised: 20 Dec 2016

See all articles by Gordon Hull

Gordon Hull

University of North Carolina at Charlotte - Department of Philosophy

Date Written: January 31, 2011

Abstract

Written for an anthology on ethics and phenomenology, this paper uses Heidegger’s discussion of artifacts in Being and Time to motivate a phenomenological critique of Digital Rights Management regimes such as the one that allows DVDs to require one to watch commercials and copyright notices. In the first section, I briefly sketch traditional ethical approaches to intellectual property and indicate the gap that a phenomenological approach can fill. In section 2, following Heidegger’s discussion in Being and Time, I analyze DRM technologies as exemplary of the breakdown of things as ready-to-hand; in particular, DRM is an example of what Heidegger calls "obstinacy." In section 3, I argue that this sort of concern generalizes beyond digital rights management due to its imbrication in ordinary, everyday experience. Finally, in section 4, I propose a framework for analyzing DRM in terms of our individuation from "the They," emphasizing how DRM undermines the functioning of "responsibility."

Keywords: Copyright - Digital Rights Management - Anti-circumvention - Phenomenology - Ethics

Suggested Citation

Hull, Gordon, Coding the Dictatorship of ‘the They:’ A Phenomenological Critique of Digital Rights Management (January 31, 2011). in Ethics and Phenomenology, eds. Mark Sanders and Jeremy Wisnewski (Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2012), 197-219, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1752395 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1752395

Gordon Hull (Contact Author)

University of North Carolina at Charlotte - Department of Philosophy ( email )

9201 University City Blvd.
Charlotte, NC 28223
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
132
Abstract Views
1,527
Rank
393,372
PlumX Metrics