The Ongoing Confusion Over Ongoing Royalties

Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1793361

76 Missouri Law Review 695 (2011)

13 Pages Posted: 28 Mar 2011 Last revised: 28 Apr 2020

Abstract

What are patentees entitled to if they don't get an injunction? Courts have tended to award reasonable royalties, but there is considerable – and unnecessary confusion about who awards those royalties and how they are calculated. In this paper, I endeavor to answer those questions.

Suggested Citation

Lemley, Mark A., The Ongoing Confusion Over Ongoing Royalties. Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1793361, 76 Missouri Law Review 695 (2011), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1793361 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1793361

Mark A. Lemley (Contact Author)

Stanford Law School ( email )

559 Nathan Abbott Way
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
539
Abstract Views
3,039
Rank
94,836
PlumX Metrics