Auditors and the Post-2002 Litigation Environment
5 Pages Posted: 6 Feb 2012 Last revised: 6 May 2012
Date Written: January 2, 2012
Abstract
In the wake of the disclosure of Enron and WorldCom and other dramatic financial reporting frauds, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act was passed on July 30, 2002. Thus, 2002 was a watershed year for auditors. Audits performed after the passage of Sarbanes-Oxley began to be reflected in litigation filed in 2003. Analysis of 1169 lawsuits filed between 2001 and 2008 finds that auditor litigation severity decreased in the lawsuits filed after 2002. Analysis of a reduced sample of 1017 lawsuits - where dollar resolution amounts are available - shows that the magnitude of auditor dollar resolution amounts decreased in the lawsuits filed after 2002. Thus, auditor liability risk decreased after 2002.
Keywords: financial reporting litigation, auditor litigation, Sarbanes-Oxley, litigation outcomes, auditor litigation outcomes
JEL Classification: K13, K22, K41, M41
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Legal Implications and Research Opportunities
-
Auditor Liability and Client Acceptance Decisions
By Volker Laux and Paul Newman
-
Scope of Auditors' Liability, Audit Quality, and Capital Investment
By Derek Chan and Kit Pong Wong
-
The Ultimate Form of Mandatory Auditor Rotation: The Case of Former Arthur Andersen Clients
By Jennifer Blouin, Barbara M. Grein, ...
-
Is Joint Audit Bad or Good? Efficiency Perspective Evidence from Three European Countries
By Cédric Lesage, Nicole V.s. Ratzinger-sakel, ...
-
By Christopher Koch and Daniel Schunk
-
Do Joint Audits Improve or Impair Audit Quality?
By Mingcherng Deng, Tong Lu, ...
-
Auditor Litigation: Evidence that Revenue Restatements Are Determinative