Informational Feedback Effect, Adverse Selection, and the Optimal Disclosure Policy

32 Pages Posted: 8 Mar 2011 Last revised: 22 Mar 2018

See all articles by Pingyang Gao

Pingyang Gao

HKU Business School

Pierre Jinghong Liang

Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University

Date Written: September 1, 2011

Abstract

Trading in a secondary stock market not only redistributes wealth among investors but also generates information that guides subsequent investment. We provide a positive theory of disclosure that reflects both functions of a secondary market. By making private information public, disclosure reduces private information acquisition and levels the playing field. However, a leveled playing field has two opposite effects on firm value. On one hand, it ameliorates adverse selection among investors and improves the liquidity of firm shares. On the other hand, it could also impede investment efficiency because less information is produced by the market and used by decision makers. This trade-off determines the optimal disclosure policy. Our theory generates new testable predictions and reconciles disclosure with other parts of securities regulation that encourage private information production.

Keywords: Disclosure, Securities Regulation, Adverse Selection, Informational Feedback Effect

JEL Classification: G14, K22, M41, M45

Suggested Citation

Gao, Pingyang and Liang, Pierre Jinghong, Informational Feedback Effect, Adverse Selection, and the Optimal Disclosure Policy (September 1, 2011). Chicago Booth Research Paper No. 11-13, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1780462 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1780462

Pingyang Gao (Contact Author)

HKU Business School ( email )

Hong Kong
China

Pierre Jinghong Liang

Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University ( email )

5000 Forbes Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15213-3890
United States
412-268-3315 (Phone)
412-268-6837 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www2.tepper.cmu.edu/andrew/liangj

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
860
Abstract Views
4,837
Rank
52,287
PlumX Metrics