How Written Advocacy Shapes Doctrine (Part I): Did Bad Briefing Decide Lochner v. New York?
Precedent, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 24-27, Winter 2012
University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-03
5 Pages Posted: 9 Mar 2012
Date Written: March 8, 2012
Abstract
Professor Abrams authors a column, Writing It Right, in Precedent, the Missouri Bar's quarterly magazine. In a variety of contexts, the column stresses the fundamentals of quality legal writing - precision, conciseness, simplicity and clarity. Future columns will be posted as they are published, every three months or so.
Keywords: advocacy, doctrine, briefs, brief, briefing, Lochner
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Abrams, Douglas E., How Written Advocacy Shapes Doctrine (Part I): Did Bad Briefing Decide Lochner v. New York? (March 8, 2012). Precedent, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 24-27, Winter 2012, University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2012-03, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2018623
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.