A Concrete Shoe for Brand X?

4 Pages Posted: 4 May 2012

See all articles by David J. Shakow

David J. Shakow

University of Pennsylvania Law School

Date Written: April 30, 2012

Abstract

The Supreme Court’s decision in Home Concrete raises new questions about the deference to be given to administrative pronouncements that conflict with prior judicial decisions. Unfortunately, the opinions of a divided Court leave practitioners to puzzle over the boundaries of its decision.

Keywords: Taxation, administrative law, administrative rules and regulations, Administrative Procedure Act, Treasury Regulation, judicial deference to IRS rulemaking, Chevron doctrine, Home Concrete, APA, Mayo Foundation

JEL Classification: K23, K34

Suggested Citation

Shakow, David J., A Concrete Shoe for Brand X? (April 30, 2012). Tax Notes, Vol. 135, p. 651, April 2012, U of Penn, Inst for Law & Econ Research Paper No. 12-21, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2051019

David J. Shakow (Contact Author)

University of Pennsylvania Law School ( email )

3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
119
Abstract Views
1,722
Rank
422,206
PlumX Metrics