Analyzing Common Themes in Legal Scholarship on Professionalism

27 Pages Posted: 27 Aug 2011 Last revised: 5 Jun 2012

See all articles by Neil W. Hamilton

Neil W. Hamilton

University of St. Thomas School of Law (Minnesota)

Date Written: 2012

Abstract

The ABA is going to change the accreditation standards to require more emphasis on fostering each student’s ethical professional formation. This requires a paradigm shift in legal education from a focus on educational inputs like a course on professional responsibility to a focus on clearly articulated learning outcomes relating to each student’s ethical development.

Law schools need help to define assessable learning outcomes for professional formation. This paper provides an analysis of existing scholarship on professionalism that will guide faculties in defining specific learning outcomes for professional formation in the context of existing scholarship in the field. There is substantial consensus among scholars that professionalism’s foundation in an internalized moral core or personal conscience. Several scholars emphasize the critically important point that a student’s understanding of professionalism is developmental meaning a student grows over time toward a fully-internalized understanding of professionalism. This means that legal educators must tailor educational engagements to each student’s stage of development.

Keywords: American Bar Association, legal education, professional responsibility, legal ethics, law schools, law school accreditation, professional formation

Suggested Citation

Hamilton, Neil W., Analyzing Common Themes in Legal Scholarship on Professionalism (2012). U of St. Thomas Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-24, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1917058 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1917058

Neil W. Hamilton (Contact Author)

University of St. Thomas School of Law (Minnesota) ( email )

MSL 400, 1000 La Salle Avenue
Minneapolis, MN Minnesota 55403-2005
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
183
Abstract Views
1,888
Rank
301,572
PlumX Metrics