Does Vertical Integration Decrease Prices? Evidence from Paramount Antitrust Case of 1948
53 Pages Posted: 16 Nov 2011 Last revised: 30 Jul 2012
Date Written: November 15, 2011
Abstract
I empirically examine the impact of the 1948 Paramount antitrust case on ticket prices using a unique data set collected from Variety magazine issues between 1945 and 1955. With weekly movie theater information on prices, revenues and theater ownership for an unbalanced panel of 393 theaters located in 26 different metropolitan areas, I find evidence consistent with Spengler’s (1950) prediction that vertical integration lowers prices through the elimination of double-marginalization. My results show that vertically integrated theaters charged lower prices and sold more admission tickets than nonvertically integrated theaters. I also find that the rate at which prices increased in theaters were slower before vertical separation than it was after separation. A back of the envelope calculation suggests that losses in consumer surplus due to the Supreme Court resolution and the corresponding sale of theater holdings by Paramount and seven other companies were sizable.
Keywords: vertical integration, prices, antitrust, movies
JEL Classification: L22, L42, L82
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Uniform Prices for Differentiated Goods: The Case of the Movie-Theater Industry
By Barak Orbach and Liran Einav
-
Managerial Objectives, the R-Rating Puzzle and the Production of Violent Films
By S. Abraham Ravid and Suman Basuroy
-
Social Networks and Exchange: Self-Confirming Dynamics in Hollywood
By Olav Sorenson and David Waguespack