The U.S. Proposal for an Intellectual Property Chapter in the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement

98 Pages Posted: 5 Dec 2012 Last revised: 13 Jul 2018

See all articles by Sean Flynn

Sean Flynn

American University - Washington College of Law; Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property

Brook K. Baker

Northeastern University - School of Law

Margot E. Kaminski

University of Colorado Law School; Yale University - Yale Information Society Project; University of Colorado at Boulder - Silicon Flatirons Center for Law, Technology, and Entrepreneurship

Jimmy Koo

American University - Washington College of Law

Date Written: December 4, 2012

Abstract

This article takes advantage of the breach in the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiation’s secrecy to contribute to a new and growing collection of published scholarship on leaked proposals for international intellectual property agreements as they are being negotiated. We begin with the general provisions of the agreement, which define its relationship to the multilateral system. We then progress to analysis of some of the most important copyright, patent and data protection, and enforcement sections of the proposal, before providing some concluding observations. Our ultimate conclusion is that the U.S. proposal, if adopted, would upset the current international framework balancing the interests of rights holders and the public. It would heighten standards of protection for rights holders well beyond that which the best available evidence or inclusive democratic processes support. It contains insufficient balancing provisions for users, consumers, and the public interest.

Keywords: intellectual property, public interest, trans-pacific partnership, world intellectual property organization, anti-counterfeiting trade agreement, ACTA, WIPO, TPP, international law, international trade

Suggested Citation

Flynn, Sean and Baker, Brook K. and Kaminski, Margot E. and Koo, Jimmy, The U.S. Proposal for an Intellectual Property Chapter in the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (December 4, 2012). American University International Law Review, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 105-202, 2013, Northeastern University School of Law Research Paper No. 133-2013, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2185402 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2185402

Sean Flynn (Contact Author)

American University - Washington College of Law ( email )

4300 Nebraska Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20016
United States

Program on Information Justice and Intellectual Property

4300 Nebraska Avenue N.W.
Washington, DC 20016
United States

Brook K. Baker

Northeastern University - School of Law ( email )

416 Huntington Avenue
Boston, MA 02115
United States

Margot E. Kaminski

University of Colorado Law School ( email )

401 UCB
Boulder, CO 80309
United States

Yale University - Yale Information Society Project ( email )

127 Wall Street
New Haven, CT 06511
United States

University of Colorado at Boulder - Silicon Flatirons Center for Law, Technology, and Entrepreneurship ( email )

Wolf Law Building
2450 Kittredge Loop Road
Boulder, CO
United States

Jimmy Koo

American University - Washington College of Law ( email )

4300 Nebraska Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20016
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,473
Abstract Views
10,854
Rank
24,210
PlumX Metrics