CEO Compensation and Board Structure Revisited – Addendum
9 Pages Posted: 4 Jun 2012 Last revised: 20 Mar 2013
Date Written: March 27, 2012
Abstract
Using Chhaochharia’s and Grinstein’s (JF, 2009) data and methodology, Guthrie, Sokolowsky, and Wan (JF, 2010) document that compensation committee independence leads to an increase in executive pay, and that the increase is concentrated in firms with powerful monitors. These findings stand in sharp contrast to the prediction of the managerial power hypothesis that director independence effectively curbs rent extraction in the form of excessive CEO pay. While it is tempting to reject the managerial power hypothesis, the evidence alternatively calls into question the effectiveness of director independence in corporate governance or the importance of reducing CEO pay to directors. In this addendum, we discuss these two possibilities.
Keywords: executive compensation, CEO pay, board structure, board independence, corporate governance, compensation committee, Sarbanes-Oxley Act
JEL Classification: G34, G38, J31, J33
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Are CEOS Really Paid Like Bureaucrats?
By Brian J. Hall and Jeffrey B. Liebman
-
Are CEOS Really Paid Like Bureaucrats?
By Brian J. Hall and Jeffrey B. Liebman
-
The Other Side of the Tradeoff: The Impact of Risk on Executive Compensation
-
Good Timing: CEO Stock Option Awards and Company News Announcements
-
Good Timing: CEO Stock Option Awards and Company News Announcements
-
The Use of Equity Grants to Manage Optimal Equity Incentive Levels
By John E. Core and Wayne R. Guay
-
The Other Side of the Tradeoff: the Impact of Risk on Executive Compensation
-
Stock Options for Undiversified Executives
By Brian J. Hall and Kevin J. Murphy