A Primary Cause of Partisanship? Nomination Systems and Legislator Ideology
American Journal of Political Science, v58, n2, April 2014, pp. 337-351
48 Pages Posted: 9 Sep 2010 Last revised: 9 Jul 2014
Date Written: May 1, 2013
Abstract
Many theoretical and empirical accounts of representation argue that primary elections are a polarizing influence. Likewise, many reformers advocate opening party nominations to non-members as a way of increasing the number of moderate elected officials. Data and measurement constraints, however, have limited the range of empirical tests of this argument. We marry a unique new data set of state legislator ideal points to a detailed accounting of primary systems in the United States to gauge the effect of primary systems on polarization. We find that the openness of a primary election has little, if any, effect on the extremity of the politicians it produces.
Keywords: State legislatures, polarization, primaries, American politics, partisanship
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures
By Boris Shor and Nolan Mccarty
-
Ideology and the Congressional Vote Appendix
By Boris Shor and Jon Rogowski
-
Mapping the Ideological Marketplace
By Adam Bonica
-
Congruence, Responsiveness, and Representation in American State Legislatures
By Boris Shor
-
By Seth E. Masket and Boris Shor
-
By Benjamin G. Bishin and Chad Murphy
-
Two Dimensions of Conflict: How Ideologues Imposed Ideology on Congress
By Hans Noel
-
By Lynda Powell
-
Reform and Representation: A New Method Applied to Recent Electoral Changes
By Thad Kousser, Justin Phillips, ...