Patents on Human Genes: An Analysis of Scope and Claims

Science, Vol. 307, 2005

2 Pages Posted: 24 Apr 2006 Last revised: 16 Aug 2017

See all articles by Jordan Paradise

Jordan Paradise

Loyola University Chicago School of Law

Lori Andrews

Chicago-Kent College of Law

Timothy R. Holbrook

University of Denver Sturm College of Law

Date Written: 2005

Abstract

There is significant domestic and international opposition to gene patents based on the fact that gene patents deter medical research and health care, as well as the policy position that genes are an inherent product of nature. Yet, equally troubling is the fact that gene patents have been issued by the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office that are problematic with respect to existing federal patent law. The authors of this Policy Forum describe their study, which examined issued gene patents covering a variety of genetic diseases and described ways in which many claims fell short of USPTO patentability requirements.

Keywords: United States Patent & Trademark Office, patent, claim, gene

Suggested Citation

Paradise, Jordan K. and Andrews, Lori and Holbrook, Timothy Richard, Patents on Human Genes: An Analysis of Scope and Claims (2005). Science, Vol. 307, 2005, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=897510

Jordan K. Paradise (Contact Author)

Loyola University Chicago School of Law ( email )

25 E. Pearson
Chicago, IL 60611
United States

Lori Andrews

Chicago-Kent College of Law ( email )

565 West Adams St.
Chicago, IL 60661
United States

Timothy Richard Holbrook

University of Denver Sturm College of Law ( email )

2255 E. Evans Avenue
Denver, CO 80210
United States

HOME PAGE: http://www.law.du.edu/about/people/tim-holbrook

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
123
Abstract Views
1,822
Rank
415,489
PlumX Metrics