Battle for Whales in the Hague: Analysis of ICJ Judgment in Australia v. Japan
19 Pages Posted: 1 Apr 2014
Date Written: March 31, 2014
Abstract
On March 31 (2014), the International Court of Justice delivered its judgment in the case concerning Whaling in the Antarctic (Australia v. Japan; New Zealand intervening). The paper analyzes the facts and reasoning of the judgment. The paper also mulls as to the response of Japanese government regarding the landmark judgment.
Keywords: Whaling in the Antarctic, Australia v. Japan, Whaling, ICJ, Judge Owada, International Convention for Regulation of Whale, UNCLOS, CITES, CBD, Japan and Whaling, JARPA II
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Rahman, Mohammad Rubaiyat, Battle for Whales in the Hague: Analysis of ICJ Judgment in Australia v. Japan (March 31, 2014). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2418817 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2418817
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.