Judicial Review of Copyright Examination

45 Pages Posted: 23 Nov 2003 Last revised: 21 Oct 2010

See all articles by Thomas G. Field

Thomas G. Field

University of New Hampshire School of Law (formerly Franklin Pierce Law Center)

Date Written: November 21, 2003

Abstract

The article urges that judicial deference to the Copyright Office's validity determinations (positive or negative) should be influenced less by the three jurisdictional contexts (one collateral, two direct) in which they may be challenged than by evident support for its position and whether that support is legal or factual. Minimally, I hope to initiate an overdue discussion of such matters.

Keywords: copyright examination, copyright registration, judicial review, administrative process, due process

Suggested Citation

Field, Thomas G., Judicial Review of Copyright Examination (November 21, 2003). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=471781 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.471781

Thomas G. Field (Contact Author)

University of New Hampshire School of Law (formerly Franklin Pierce Law Center) ( email )

Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
United States

HOME PAGE: http://https://law.unh.edu/faculty/field

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
119
Abstract Views
1,860
Rank
422,206
PlumX Metrics