The Role of Procedural Controls in the Ergonomics Rulemaking

20 Pages Posted: 16 Sep 2004

See all articles by Stuart Shapiro

Stuart Shapiro

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy

Date Written: September 13, 2004

Abstract

Few, if any, regulations over the past decade have received the publicity or engendered the controversy of OSHA's ergonomics regulation. Some may see the ergonomics rule as the paradigmatic instance of procedural hurdles holding up and eventually destroying a regulation. The purpose of this article is to examine the role that procedure played in the ergonomics rulemaking and to generate hypotheses about how procedural controls work in general. To draw lessons from the ergonomics rulemaking I have conducted analyses of the four publicly available versions and conducted interviews with seven high ranking officials at OSHA and the Small Business Administration. I find that of the procedural hurdles faced by OSHA, the notice and comment requirement had the largest impact on the final rule. OMB review and requirements to conduct a cost benefit analysis served largely as a fire alarm to political overseers and the required small business panel had largely symbolic effects. The more traditional control of Congressional budgetary oversight had the greatest effect by delaying the rule for three years which eventually doomed OSHA's attempts to regulate.

Keywords: Ergonomics, rulemaking, regulation, notice and comment, OIRA, SBREFA, bureaucracy

JEL Classification: D73, K23

Suggested Citation

Shapiro, Stuart, The Role of Procedural Controls in the Ergonomics Rulemaking (September 13, 2004). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=590843 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.590843

Stuart Shapiro (Contact Author)

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey - Edward J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy ( email )

New Brunswick, NJ 08901
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
131
Abstract Views
1,327
Rank
45,654
PlumX Metrics