Objectivist vs. Subjectivist Views of Criminality: A Study in the Role of Social Science in Criminal Law Theory

40 Pages Posted: 18 Feb 2003

See all articles by Paul H. Robinson

Paul H. Robinson

University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School

John M. Darley

Princeton University

Abstract

The article identifies a pattern of doctrinal shift from common law criminal law to modern criminal codes and uses social science methodology to determine whether the shift is one that reflects changing community views of what ought to constitute criminality. The study finds that the objectivist-subjectivist distinction that it defines does indeed capture a distinction important to lay perceptions of criminality, but that lay perceptions have not shifted from the objectivist view of common law to the subjectivist view of modern codes, as the law and many commentators suggest. Rather, the study results suggest that lay persons agree with the subjectivist view of modern codes in defining the minimum requirements of criminality, but prefer the common law's objectivist view of grading the punishment deserved for a violation. We argue that there is practical value in having the criminal law track shared community intuitions of the proper rules for assigning liability and punishment. For that reason, the study results support the often criticized subjectivist view of modern codes in setting the minimum requirements of liability, but disapprove of the modern code shift away from the common law's objectivist view of grading. Beyond its conclusion's implications for future criminal code reform, the study suggests that social science research, properly done and carefully focused, can help resolve criminal law theory debates that rest in whole or in part on claims of what people see as just punishment.

JEL Classification: K14

Suggested Citation

Robinson, Paul H. and Darley, John M., Objectivist vs. Subjectivist Views of Criminality: A Study in the Role of Social Science in Criminal Law Theory. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=10271 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.10271

Paul H. Robinson (Contact Author)

University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School ( email )

3501 Sansom Street
Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States

John M. Darley

Princeton University ( email )

1-N-17 Green Hall
Princeton, NJ 08544
United States
609-258-3000 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
460
Abstract Views
7,028
Rank
114,898
PlumX Metrics