ATM Surcharge Bans and Bank Market Structure: The Case of Iowa and its Neighbors

39 Pages Posted: 5 Jan 2006

See all articles by Timothy H. Hannan

Timothy H. Hannan

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System

Date Written: October 2005

Abstract

It is frequently claimed that high ATM surcharges actually attract customers to the banks that impose them, particularly if they operate large ATM networks. By exploiting as natural experiments two events associated with the lifting of surcharge bans in Iowa and in the states that neighbor Iowa, this paper seeks to test for the implications of this phenomenon as it applies to the market shares of banking institutions and to several aspects of market structure. Consistent with these implications, results of difference-in-difference analyses suggest that the shares of larger market participants increase, the shares of smaller market participants decrease, market concentration increases, and the number of market competitors decreases after the lifting of surcharge bans.

Keywords: ATMs surcharge competition

JEL Classification: H2, I3

Suggested Citation

Hannan, Timothy, ATM Surcharge Bans and Bank Market Structure: The Case of Iowa and its Neighbors (October 2005). FEDS Working Paper No. 2005-46, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=873843 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.873843

Timothy Hannan (Contact Author)

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System ( email )

20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20551
United States
202-452-2919 (Phone)
202-452-3819 (Fax)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
97
Abstract Views
1,209
Rank
486,956
PlumX Metrics