The Acquisition Performance of S&P 500 Firms
37 Pages Posted: 8 Dec 2006
Date Written: March 2007
Abstract
We compare the acquisition performance of S&P 500 and non-S&P 500 firms after controlling for differences in firm characteristics. During 1980-2004, S&P 500 firms make a greater number and dollar value of acquisitions. They more often use cash payment and tender offers, the market reacts better to the announcement of their acquisitions, and they are more likely to complete their deals. The target shareholders seem to attach incremental value to joining with an S&P 500 firm and accept a lower premium in stock deals. The S&P 500 acquirers also have stronger pre-acquisition operating performance, choose targets with stronger pre-acquisition performance, and realize significant gains in post-acquisition performance. We interpret the combined evidence as consistent with the efficiency hypothesis, which suggests that S&P 500 firms are more efficiently managed firms and make better acquirers.
Keywords: S&P 500, Mergers and Acquisitions, Efficiency, Operating Performance
JEL Classification: G34
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
New Evidence and Perspectives on Mergers
By Gregor Andrade, Mark L. Mitchell, ...
-
Do Managerial Objectives Drive Bad Acquisitions?
By Randall Morck, Andrei Shleifer, ...
-
Stock Market Driven Acquisitions
By Andrei Shleifer and Robert W. Vishny
-
Stock Market Driven Acquisitions
By Andrei Shleifer and Robert W. Vishny
-
Poison or Placebo? Evidence on the Deterrent and Wealth Effects of Modern Antitakeover Measures
By Robert Comment and G. William Schwert
-
Does Corporate Performance Improve after Mergers?
By Paul M. Healy, Krishna Palepu, ...
-
Managerial Performance, Tobin's Q, and the Gains from Successful Tender Offers
By Larry H.p. Lang, Ralph A. Walkling, ...