Difference in Differences Analysis in Antitrust: What Does it Really Measure?
10 Pages Posted: 7 May 2007
Date Written: May 4, 2007
Abstract
Merger retrospectives often use a difference in differences (DID) approach to measure the price effects of mergers. As used in these studies, this approach implicitly assumes that the price in the control market fully controls for supply and demand shocks in the treatment market if the two markets experience the same demand and supply shocks. In this paper, we first show that this is only true if the parameters that determine how supply and demand shocks affect price are the same in the two markets. We then show that in many plausible circumstances the DID approach could either overestimate or underestimate the price effects of a merger.
Keywords: merger retrospectives
JEL Classification: L1,L4,K21
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Antitrust Evaluation of Horizontal Mergers: An Economic Alternative to Market Definition
By Joseph Farrell and Carl Shapiro
-
The Effect of Mergers on Consumer Prices: Evidence from Five Selected Case Studies
-
Reinvigorating Horizontal Merger Enforcement
By Jonathan B. Baker and Carl Shapiro
-
Reinvigorating Horizontal Merger Enforcement
By Jonathan B. Baker and Carl Shapiro
-
The Need to Measure the Effect of Merger Policy and How to Do It
-
Why We Need to Measure the Effect of Merger Policy and How to Do it
-
Competition Policy with Optimally Differentiated Rules Instead of 'Per Se Rules vs. Rule of Reason'
-
Merger Simulation in Competition Policy: A Survey
By Oliver Budzinski and Isabel Ruhmer
-
Generating Evidence to Guide Merger Enforcement
By Orley Ashenfelter, Daniel S. Hosken, ...
-
Merger Retrospective Studies: A Review
By Graeme Hunter, Gregory K. Leonard, ...