Internal Finance and Firm Investment
38 Pages Posted: 31 May 2004 Last revised: 2 Jan 2022
Date Written: June 1993
Abstract
We examine the neoclassical investment model using a panel of U.S. manufacturing firms. The standard model with no financing constraints cannot be rejected for firms with high (pre-sample) dividend payouts. However, it is decisively rejected for firms with low (pre-sample) payouts (firms we expect to face financing constraints). Hem, investment is sensitive to both firm cash flow and macroeconomic credit conditions, holding constant investment opportunities. Sample splits based on firm size or maturity do not produce such distinctions. The latter comparison identifies firms where "free-cash-flow" problems might be expected to produce correlations between investment and cash flow.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Financing Constraints and Corporate Investment
By Steven M. Fazzari, Bruce C. Petersen, ...
-
Measurement Error and the Relationship between Investment and Q
By Timothy Erickson and Toni M. Whited
-
Inflation, Taxation, and Corporate Investment: A Q-Theory Approach
-
The Stock Market, Profit and Investment
By Olivier J. Blanchard, Changyong Rhee, ...
-
Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities are Not Valid Measures of Financing Constraints
By Steven N. Kaplan and Luigi Zingales
-
The Present Value of Profits and Cyclical Movements in Investment