Social Science Research Network
QuickSearch SSRN eLibrary

Search Within Results




Feedback to SSRN

SSRN eLibrary Statistics:

Papers & Authors:
Abstracts: 566,047
Full Text Papers: 468,176
Authors: 262,454
Papers Received in
  Last 12 months:
63,698

Paper Downloads:
To date: 78,688,977
Last 12 months: 9,719,885
Last 30 days: 793,227

CiteReader:  What's this?
Papers with
  Resolved
  References:
263,937
Total References: 9,064,481
Papers with Cites: 243,212
Total Citation
  Links:
6,006,875
Papers with
  Resolved
  Footnotes:
93,431
Total Footnotes: 9,185,839


SSRN eLibrary Search Results
JEL Code: K21
711,051 Total downloads
Showing Papers 2,101 - 2,150 of 2,926
Sort By
1 2 3 4 ... Last | Next >


Incl. Electronic Paper ‘Thou Shall Not…(Dis)Trust’: Codes of Conduct and Harmonization of Professional Standards in the EU
TILEC Discussion Paper No. 2009-029
Panagiotis Delimatsis
Tilburg Law and Economics Center (TILEC)
Date Posted: July 09, 2009
Working Paper Series
107 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper ‘Judging’ Economists: Economic Expertise in Competition Law Litigation - A European View
NEW CHALLENGES IN EC COMPETITION LAW ENFORCEMENT, Ioannis Lianos & Ioannis Kokkoris, eds.,Kluwer, Forthcoming, University College of London Centre for Law and Economics Working Paper No. 01-09
Ioannis Lianos
University College London - Faculty of Laws
Date Posted: September 05, 2009
Last Revised: March 26, 2013
Working Paper Series
687 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper Специфика и возможности использования опыта Европейского Союза в сфере правового регулирования франчайзинга (The Specifics and Relevance of the European Union Experience in the Field of Legal Regulation of Franchising)
Industrial and Trade Law, No. 4, pp. 65-88, 2005
Vera Korzun
Fordham University School of Law
Date Posted: February 22, 2012
Last Revised: July 05, 2014
Accepted Paper Series
38 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper ¿Es Verdaderamente Necesaria Una Iniciativa Comunitaria Destinada a Incentivar Las Acciones de Daños por Cártel? Una Mirada a la Experiencia Española (Do We Need a European Commission Initiative to Foster Cartel Damages' Private Claims? A Look at the Spanish Experience)
Francisco Marcos
IE Law School
Date Posted: March 23, 2012
Working Paper Series
77 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper Zur Anspruchsberechtigung indirekter Abnehmer im Kartellrecht nach dem ORWI-Urteil des BGH - Urt. v. 28.06.2011, KZR 75/10 (Indirect Purchasers’ Right to Claim Cartel Damages after the ORWI-Judgment of the German Supreme Court of Civil Law)
JZ - JuristenZeitung 2012, 777
Christian Kersting and Sebastian Dworschak
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf - Faculty of Law and Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf - Faculty of Law
Date Posted: February 06, 2014
Last Revised: September 17, 2014
Accepted Paper Series
17 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper Your Money and Your Life: The Export of U.S. Antitrust Remedies
Competition Law and Development (D. Daniel Sokol, Thomas K. Cheng, and Ioannis Lianos, eds.) (Stanford Univ. Press 2013), NYU Law and Economics Research Paper No. 14-01
Harry First
New York University School of Law
Date Posted: November 24, 2013
Last Revised: January 11, 2014
Accepted Paper Series
62 downloads

You Can't See Where You're Going with Your Nose in a Book: Will the Digital Market Signal Book Price Fixing's Fate?
Emma Linklater
European University Institute
Date Posted: July 09, 2013
Working Paper Series

Incl. Electronic Paper Würde Eine Unabhängige Europäische Wettbewerbsbehörde Eine Bessere Wettbewerbspolitik Machen? (Would an Independent European Competition Agency Perform a Better Competition Policy?)
Oliver Budzinski
Ilmenau University of Technology
Date Posted: November 23, 2012
Working Paper Series
38 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper WTO: A Threat to European Films?
ACTAS DEL v. CONGRESO 'CULTURA EUROPEA', Enrique Banús, Beatriz Elío, eds., pp. 865-878, Elcano: Aranzadi, 2000,
Christoph B. Graber
University of Lucerne, Faculty of Law
Date Posted: June 01, 2010
Accepted Paper Series
116 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper WTO Core Principles and Prohibition: Obligations Relating to Private Practices, National Competition Laws, and Implications for a Competition Policy Framework
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Report, 2003
James H. Mathis
University of Amsterdam - Faculty of Law
Date Posted: December 11, 2011
Accepted Paper Series
28 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper WTO Competition Law Revisited: From TRIPS Competition Flexibilities and Singapore Issues to the WTO Agenda of a Post-Doha Round
Lund University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2009:51
Tu T. Nguyen and Hans Henrik Lidgard
Faculty of Law, Lund University and Lund University - Faculty of Law
Date Posted: August 16, 2009
Working Paper Series
240 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper Wright Stuff
Regulation, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 8-13, Spring 2007
Richard A. Epstein
New York University School of Law
Date Posted: April 06, 2007
Accepted Paper Series
71 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper World War 4.0: The Intel Antitrust Wars
Baltimore Sun, p. 11A, July 31, 2008
Robert H. Lande
University of Baltimore - School of Law
Date Posted: August 19, 2008
Last Revised: September 24, 2008
Accepted Paper Series
127 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper Workable Antitrust Remedies
Antitrust Source, August 2007
William H. Page
University of Florida - Fredric G. Levin College of Law
Date Posted: June 12, 2009
Accepted Paper Series
60 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper Wonderful Potencies: Deep Structure and the Problem of Monopoly in Agricultural Biotechnology
Engineering Trouble: Genetic Engineering and Its Discontents, Kelso and Schurman, eds., University of California Press, 2003, U of Colorado Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-10
William Boyd
University of Colorado Law School
Date Posted: June 09, 2012
Accepted Paper Series
45 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper Wireless Competition Under Spectrum Exhaust
Phoenix Center Policy Paper No. 43
Thomas Randolph Beard , George S. Ford , Lawrence J. Spiwak and Michael L. Stern
Auburn University - Department of Economics , Phoenix Center for Advanced Legal & Economic Public Policy Studies , Phoenix Center for Advanced Legal & Economic Public Policy Studies and Auburn University
Date Posted: August 18, 2012
Accepted Paper Series
39 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper WIPO and the American Constitution: Thoughts on a New Treaty Relating to Actors and Musicians
Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment and Technology Law, Vol. 16 (2014), Florida International University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 13-09
Hannibal Travis
Florida International University College of Law
Date Posted: June 19, 2013
Last Revised: January 10, 2014
Accepted Paper Series
57 downloads

Wintel: Cooperation and Conflict
Management Science, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 584-598, April 2007, Harvard Business School Strategy Unit Working Paper No. 1297286
Ramon Casadesus-Masanell and David Yoffie
Harvard University - Strategy Unit and Harvard University - Strategy Unit
Date Posted: November 09, 2008
Working Paper Series

Incl. Electronic Paper Will Ticket Scalpers Meet the Same Fate as Spinal Tap Drummers? The Sale and Resale of Concert and Sports Tickets
University of Tennessee Legal Studies Research Paper No. 238
Gregory M. Stein
University of Tennessee College of Law
Date Posted: February 21, 2014
Last Revised: April 07, 2014
Working Paper Series
364 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper Will the Wheatley Recommendations Fix LIBOR?
CPI Antitrust Chronicle November 2012(2)
Rosa M. Abrantes-Metz and David S. Evans
Global Economics Group, LLC and University of Chicago Law School
Date Posted: November 30, 2012
Working Paper Series
208 downloads

Will the Sparks Fly? The Role of the European Union in the Liberalization of the Electricity Industry
Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, Vol. 3, pp. 239-277, 2000
Angus Johnston
University of Oxford - Faculty of Law
Date Posted: January 12, 2005
Accepted Paper Series

Incl. Electronic Paper Wi-Fi Everywhere: Universal Broadband Access as Antitrust and Telecommunications Policy
American University Law Review, Vol. 55, pp. 1697-1800, August 2006
Hannibal Travis
Florida International University College of Law
Date Posted: May 22, 2006
Accepted Paper Series
613 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper Why the Supreme Court Was Correct to Deny Certiorari in FTC v. Rambus
George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 09-14, Global Competition Policy (March 2009, Release Two)
Joshua D. Wright
Federal Trade Commission
Date Posted: February 27, 2009
Last Revised: December 28, 2013
Working Paper Series
362 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper Why the New Evidence on Minimum Resale Price Maintenance Does Not Justify a Per Se or 'Quick Look' Approach
CPI Antitrust Chronicle November 2013 (1), University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2013-20
Thomas A. Lambert and Michael E. Sykuta
University of Missouri - School of Law and University of Missouri at Columbia - Contracting and Organizations Research Institute (CORI)
Date Posted: December 04, 2013
Last Revised: December 05, 2013
Accepted Paper Series
113 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper Why the Google Books Settlement is Procompetitive
The Journal of Legal Analysis, Vol. 2, No. 1, p. 1-68, 2010
Einer Elhauge
Harvard Law School
Date Posted: January 04, 2010
Last Revised: October 27, 2012
Working Paper Series
1006 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper Why the EU Merger Regulation Should Not Enjoy a Monopoly Over Tacit Collusion - A Close Look at Five Common Misconceptions
Nicolas Petit and David Henry
University of Liege - School of Law and Howrey LLP
Date Posted: February 01, 2010
Working Paper Series
354 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper Why the 'Scope of the Patent' Test Cannot Solve the Drug Patent Settlement Problem
Stanford Technology Law Review, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2012
Michael A. Carrier
Rutgers University School of Law - Camden
Date Posted: September 15, 2012
Accepted Paper Series
201 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper Why More Antitrust Immunity for the Media is a Bad Idea
Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 105, p. 1399, 2011, University of Tennessee Legal Studies Research Paper No. 134
Maurice E. Stucke and Allen P. Grunes
University of Tennessee College of Law and The Konkurrenz Group
Date Posted: November 17, 2010
Last Revised: February 22, 2012
Accepted Paper Series
163 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper Why Markets Matter for Evidence-Based Merger Analysis
Oxera Agenda, January 2010
Malcolm B. Coate and Jeffrey H. Fischer
U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
Date Posted: March 03, 2010
Accepted Paper Series
170 downloads

Why Do Christie and Schultz Infer Collusion from Their Data?
Allan W. Kleidon and Robert Willig
Cornerstone Research and Princeton University - Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs
Date Posted: August 25, 1998
Working Paper Series

Incl. Electronic Paper Why Different Jurisdictions Do Not (and Should Not) Adopt the Same Antitrust Rules
Chicago Journal of International Law, Forthcoming
David S. Evans
University of Chicago Law School
Date Posted: February 13, 2009
Accepted Paper Series
546 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper Why Can’t We All Just Get Along: Structural Modeling and Natural Experiments in Merger Analysis
Malcolm B. Coate and Jeffrey H. Fischer
U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
Date Posted: May 31, 2011
Last Revised: November 17, 2011
Working Paper Series
129 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper Why Antitrust Should Defer to the Intellectual Property Rules of Standard-Setting Organizations: A Commentary on Teece & Sherry
Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 87, p. 2019, 2003
Michael A. Carrier
Rutgers University School of Law - Camden
Date Posted: August 05, 2005
Accepted Paper Series
318 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper Why Antitrust Damage Levels Should Be Raised
Loyola Consumer Law Review, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2004
Robert H. Lande
University of Baltimore - School of Law
Date Posted: April 10, 2008
Last Revised: November 17, 2008
Accepted Paper Series
160 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper Why and How to Use Empirical Screens in Antitrust Compliance
CPI Antitrust Chronicle, Vol. 1, February 2012
Rosa M. Abrantes-Metz
Global Economics Group, LLC
Date Posted: February 17, 2012
Accepted Paper Series
125 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper Why an Original can be Better than a Copy: Intellectual Property, the Antitrust Refusal to Deal, and ISO Antitrust Litigation
Supreme Court Economic Review, Vol. 9, 2001
Michelle Burtis and Bruce H. Kobayashi
LECG, LLC and George Mason University - School of Law
Date Posted: February 16, 2001
Accepted Paper Series
432 downloads

Why Above-Cost Price Cuts to Drive Out Entrants Do Not Signal Predation or Even Market Power - And the Implications for Defining Costs
Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper No. 360
Einer Elhauge
Harvard Law School
Date Posted: June 07, 2002
Accepted Paper Series

Incl. Electronic Paper Why Copperweld Was Actually Kind of Dumb: Sound, Fury, and the Once and Still Missing Antitrust Theory of the Firm?
Villanova Sports and Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 17, 2011, Cleveland-Marshall Legal Studies Paper No. 11-206
Chris Sagers
Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, Cleveland State University
Date Posted: February 22, 2011
Accepted Paper Series
88 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper Why (Ever) Define Markets? An Answer to Professor Kaplow
Gregory J. Werden
U.S. Department of Justice - Antitrust Division
Date Posted: February 14, 2012
Working Paper Series
721 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper Why (Ever) Define Markets?
Harvard Law Review, Forthcoming, Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper No. 666, Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 11-08
Louis Kaplow
Harvard Law School
Date Posted: January 29, 2011
Last Revised: March 03, 2014
Accepted Paper Series
322 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper Why (and How) Fairness Matters at the IP/Antitrust Interface
Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 87, June 2003
Daniel A. Farber and Brett McDonnell
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law and University of Minnesota Law School
Date Posted: September 25, 2003
Accepted Paper Series
357 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper Wholesale Price Discrimination and Parallel Imports
CESifo Working Paper Series No. 1951
Mattias Ganslandt and Keith E. Maskus
Centre for European Law and Economics and University of Colorado at Boulder - Department of Economics
Date Posted: April 18, 2007
Working Paper Series
210 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper Wholesale Price Discrimination and Parallel Imports
Mattias Ganslandt and Keith E. Maskus
Centre for European Law and Economics and University of Colorado at Boulder - Department of Economics
Date Posted: March 09, 2007
Working Paper Series
68 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper Who Suffered Antitrust Injury in the the Microsoft Case?
Who Suffered Antitrust Injury in the Microsoft Case?, 69 George Washington L. Rev. 829 (2001), George Washington Law Review, Vol. 69, 2001
John E. Lopatka and William H. Page
Penn State Law and University of Florida - Fredric G. Levin College of Law
Date Posted: May 30, 2009
Accepted Paper Series
44 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper Who Owns the Charles River Bridge? Intellectual Property and Competition in the Software Industry
UC Berkeley Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper No. 15
Robert P. Merges
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law
Date Posted: February 28, 2000
Working Paper Series
947 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper Who Must Fear the Brazilian Antitrust Authority? The Control of Cartels and Monopolies in Brazil During the Last 10 Years (1998-2007)
João Eduardo Gomide de Paula , Ademir Antonio Pereira Jr. and Gabriel Nascimento Pinto
University of Sao Paulo (USP) , University of Sao Paulo (USP) and University of Sao Paulo - Faculdade de Direito
Date Posted: April 17, 2008
Working Paper Series
163 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper Who Determines the Optimal Trade-Off between Quality and Price?
Loyola Consumer Law Review, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2002
Barbara Ann White
University of Baltimore - School of Law
Date Posted: June 12, 2010
Working Paper Series
37 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper Whither Symmetry? Antitrust Analysis of Intellectual Property Rights at the FTC and DOJ
Competition Policy International, Vol. 9, No. 2, Fall 2013, Forthcoming, George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 13-71
Joshua D. Wright and Douglas H. Ginsburg
Federal Trade Commission and George Mason University School of Law
Date Posted: December 11, 2013
Accepted Paper Series
151 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper Whither Dr. Miles?
Loyola Consumer Law Review, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2007
Mark D. Bauer
Stetson University - College of Law
Date Posted: August 28, 2007
Last Revised: August 21, 2012
Accepted Paper Series
253 downloads

Incl. Electronic Paper Which Goals Count in Article 101 TFEU?: Public Policy and its Discontents
European Competition Law Review, 2011
Christopher Townley
King's College London – The Dickson Poon School of Law
Date Posted: September 13, 2011
Last Revised: November 27, 2013
Accepted Paper Series
328 downloads


 

1 2 3 4 ... Last | Next >


 

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 6.422 seconds