Feedback to SSRN (Beta)
SSRN eLibrary Statistics:
Papers & Authors:
Abstracts:
485,161
Full Text Papers:
394,479
Authors:
227,127
Papers Received in Last 12 months:
69,082
Paper Downloads:
To date:
66,070,363
Last 12 months:
11,183,867
Last 30 days:
1,021,006
CiteReader: What's this?
Papers with Resolved References:
238,981
Total References:
8,480,523
Papers with Cites:
230,038
Total Citation Links:
5,722,240
Papers with Resolved Footnotes:
77,812
Total Footnotes:
8,534,471
SSRN eLibrary Search Results
JEL Code: K21
592,100 Total downloads
Showing Papers 81 - 130 of 2,460
Sort By
Abstract Title, A-Z
Abstract Title, Z-A
Downloads, Ascending
Downloads, Descending
Date Posted, Ascending
Date Posted, Descending
‘Thou Shall Not…(Dis)Trust’: Codes of Conduct and Harmonization of Professional Standards in the EU
TILEC Discussion Paper No. 2009-029
Panagiotis Delimatsis
Tilburg Law and Economics Center (TILEC)
Date Posted: July 09, 2009
Working Paper Series
88 downloads
‘Judging’ Economists: Economic Expertise in Competition Law Litigation - A European View
NEW CHALLENGES IN EC COMPETITION LAW ENFORCEMENT, Ioannis Lianos & Ioannis Kokkoris, eds.,Kluwer, Forthcoming, University College of London Centre for Law and Economics Working Paper No. 01-09
Ioannis Lianos
University College London - Faculty of Laws
Date Posted: September 05, 2009
Last Revised: March 26, 2013
Working Paper Series
582 downloads
¿Es Verdaderamente Necesaria Una Iniciativa Comunitaria Destinada a Incentivar Las Acciones de Daños por Cártel? Una Mirada a la Experiencia Española (Do We Need a European Commission Initiative to Foster Cartel Damages' Private Claims? A Look at the Spanish Experience)
Francisco Marcos
Instituto de Empresa Business School
Date Posted: March 23, 2012
Working Paper Series
47 downloads
Würde Eine Unabhängige Europäische Wettbewerbsbehörde Eine Bessere Wettbewerbspolitik Machen? (Would an Independent European Competition Agency Perform a Better Competition Policy?)
Oliver Budzinski
Ilmenau University of Technology
Date Posted: November 23, 2012
Working Paper Series
32 downloads
WTO: A Threat to European Films?
ACTAS DEL v. CONGRESO 'CULTURA EUROPEA', Enrique Banús, Beatriz Elío, eds., pp. 865-878, Elcano: Aranzadi, 2000,
Christoph B. Graber
University of Luzern Law School
Date Posted: June 01, 2010
Accepted Paper Series
88 downloads
WTO Core Principles and Prohibition: Obligations Relating to Private Practices, National Competition Laws, and Implications for a Competition Policy Framework
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Report, 2003
James H. Mathis
University of Amsterdam - Faculty of Law
Date Posted: December 11, 2011
Accepted Paper Series
22 downloads
WTO Competition Law Revisited: From TRIPS Competition Flexibilities and Singapore Issues to the WTO Agenda of a Post-Doha Round
Lund University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2009:51
Tu T. Nguyen and
Hans Henrik Lidgard
Faculty of Law, Lund University
and
Lund University - Faculty of Law
Date Posted: August 16, 2009
Working Paper Series
233 downloads
Wright Stuff
Regulation, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 8-13, Spring 2007
Richard A. Epstein
New York University School of Law
Date Posted: April 06, 2007
Accepted Paper Series
68 downloads
World War 4.0: The Intel Antitrust Wars
Baltimore Sun, p. 11A, July 31, 2008
Robert H. Lande
University of Baltimore - School of Law
Date Posted: August 19, 2008
Last Revised: September 24, 2008
Accepted Paper Series
126 downloads
Workable Antitrust Remedies
Antitrust Source, August 2007
William H. Page
University of Florida - Fredric G. Levin College of Law
Date Posted: June 12, 2009
Accepted Paper Series
57 downloads
Wonderful Potencies: Deep Structure and the Problem of Monopoly in Agricultural Biotechnology
Engineering Trouble: Genetic Engineering and Its Discontents, Kelso and Schurman, eds., University of California Press, 2003, U of Colorado Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 12-10
William Boyd
University of Colorado Law School
Date Posted: June 09, 2012
Accepted Paper Series
19 downloads
Wireless Competition Under Spectrum Exhaust
Phoenix Center Policy Paper No. 43
T. Randolph Beard ,
George S. Ford ,
Lawrence J. Spiwak
and
Michael L. Stern
Auburn University - Department of Economics
,
Phoenix Center for Advanced Legal & Economic Public Policy Studies
,
Phoenix Center for Advanced Legal & Economic Public Policy Studies
and
Auburn University
Date Posted: August 18, 2012
Accepted Paper Series
26 downloads
Wintel: Cooperation and Conflict
Management Science, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 584-598, April 2007, Harvard Business School Strategy Unit Working Paper No. 1297286
Ramon Casadesus-Masanell and
David Yoffie
Harvard University - Strategy Unit
and
Harvard University - Strategy Unit
Date Posted: November 09, 2008
Working Paper Series
Will the Wheatley Recommendations Fix LIBOR?
CPI Antitrust Chronicle November 2012(2)
Rosa M. Abrantes-Metz
and
David S. Evans
Global Economics Group, LLC
and
University of Chicago Law School
Date Posted: November 30, 2012
Working Paper Series
122 downloads
Will the Sparks Fly? The Role of the European Union in the Liberalization of the Electricity Industry
Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, Vol. 3, pp. 239-277, 2000
Angus Johnston
University of Oxford - Faculty of Law
Date Posted: January 12, 2005
Accepted Paper Series
Wi-Fi Everywhere: Universal Broadband Access as Antitrust and Telecommunications Policy
American University Law Review, Vol. 55, pp. 1697-1800, August 2006
Hannibal Travis
Florida International University College of Law
Date Posted: May 22, 2006
Accepted Paper Series
592 downloads
Why the Supreme Court Was Correct to Deny Certiorari in FTC v. Rambus
George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 09-14, Global Competition Policy (March 2009, Release Two)
Joshua D. Wright
George Mason University School of Law
Date Posted: February 27, 2009
Last Revised: November 05, 2009
Working Paper Series
342 downloads
Why the Google Books Settlement is Procompetitive
The Journal of Legal Analysis, Vol. 2, No. 1, p. 1-68, 2010
Einer Elhauge
Harvard Law School
Date Posted: January 04, 2010
Last Revised: October 27, 2012
Working Paper Series
977 downloads
Why the EU Merger Regulation Should Not Enjoy a Monopoly Over Tacit Collusion - A Close Look at Five Common Misconceptions
Nicolas Petit
and
David Henry
University of Liege
and
Howrey LLP
Date Posted: February 01, 2010
Working Paper Series
311 downloads
Why the 'Scope of the Patent' Test Cannot Solve the Drug Patent Settlement Problem
Stanford Technology Law Review, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2012
Michael A. Carrier
Rutgers University School of Law - Camden
Date Posted: September 15, 2012
Accepted Paper Series
164 downloads
Why More Antitrust Immunity for the Media is a Bad Idea
Northwestern University Law Review, Vol. 105, p. 1399, 2011, University of Tennessee Legal Studies Research Paper No. 134
Maurice E. Stucke and
Allen P. Grunes
University of Tennessee College of Law
and
Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP
Date Posted: November 17, 2010
Last Revised: February 22, 2012
Accepted Paper Series
152 downloads
Why Markets Matter for Evidence-Based Merger Analysis
Oxera Agenda, January 2010
Malcolm B. Coate
and
Jeffrey H. Fischer
U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
and
U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
Date Posted: March 03, 2010
Accepted Paper Series
167 downloads
Why Do Christie and Schultz Infer Collusion from Their Data?
Allan W. Kleidon and
Robert Willig
Cornerstone Research
and
Princeton University - Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs
Date Posted: August 25, 1998
Working Paper Series
Why Different Jurisdictions Do Not (and Should Not) Adopt the Same Antitrust Rules
Chicago Journal of International Law, Forthcoming
David S. Evans
University of Chicago Law School
Date Posted: February 13, 2009
Accepted Paper Series
471 downloads
Why Can’t We All Just Get Along: Structural Modeling and Natural Experiments in Merger Analysis
Malcolm B. Coate
and
Jeffrey H. Fischer
U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
and
U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
Date Posted: May 31, 2011
Last Revised: November 17, 2011
Working Paper Series
116 downloads
Why Antitrust Should Defer to the Intellectual Property Rules of Standard-Setting Organizations: A Commentary on Teece & Sherry
Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 87, p. 2019, 2003
Michael A. Carrier
Rutgers University School of Law - Camden
Date Posted: August 05, 2005
Accepted Paper Series
307 downloads
Why Antitrust Damage Levels Should Be Raised
Loyola Consumer Law Review, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2004
Robert H. Lande
University of Baltimore - School of Law
Date Posted: April 10, 2008
Last Revised: November 17, 2008
Accepted Paper Series
146 downloads
Why and How to Use Empirical Screens in Antitrust Compliance
CPI Antitrust Chronicle, Vol. 1, February 2012
Rosa M. Abrantes-Metz
Global Economics Group, LLC
Date Posted: February 17, 2012
Accepted Paper Series
85 downloads
Why an Original can be Better than a Copy: Intellectual Property, the Antitrust Refusal to Deal, and ISO Antitrust Litigation
Supreme Court Economic Review, Vol. 9, 2001
Michelle Burtis and
Bruce H. Kobayashi
LECG, LLC
and
George Mason University - School of Law
Date Posted: February 16, 2001
Accepted Paper Series
424 downloads
Why Above-Cost Price Cuts to Drive Out Entrants Do Not Signal Predation or Even Market Power - And the Implications for Defining Costs
Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper No. 360
Einer Elhauge
Harvard Law School
Date Posted: June 07, 2002
Accepted Paper Series
Why Copperweld Was Actually Kind of Dumb: Sound, Fury, and the Once and Still Missing Antitrust Theory of the Firm?
Villanova Sports and Entertainment Law Journal, Vol. 17, 2011, Cleveland-Marshall Legal Studies Paper No. 11-206
Chris Sagers
Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, Cleveland State University
Date Posted: February 22, 2011
Accepted Paper Series
77 downloads
Why (Ever) Define Markets? An Answer to Professor Kaplow
Gregory J. Werden
U.S. Department of Justice - Antitrust Division
Date Posted: February 14, 2012
Working Paper Series
521 downloads
Why (Ever) Define Markets?
Harvard Law Review, Forthcoming, Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper No. 666, Harvard Public Law Working Paper No. 11-08
Louis Kaplow
Harvard Law School
Date Posted: January 29, 2011
Last Revised: March 30, 2011
Accepted Paper Series
211 downloads
Why (and How) Fairness Matters at the IP/Antitrust Interface
Minnesota Law Review, Vol. 87, June 2003
Daniel A. Farber and
Brett McDonnell
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law
and
University of Minnesota Law School
Date Posted: September 25, 2003
Accepted Paper Series
344 downloads
Wholesale Price Discrimination and Parallel Imports
Mattias Ganslandt and
Keith E. Maskus
Centre for European Law and Economics
and
University of Colorado at Boulder - Department of Economics
Date Posted: March 09, 2007
Working Paper Series
63 downloads
Wholesale Price Discrimination and Parallel Imports
CESifo Working Paper Series No. 1951
Mattias Ganslandt and
Keith E. Maskus
Centre for European Law and Economics
and
University of Colorado at Boulder - Department of Economics
Date Posted: April 18, 2007
Working Paper Series
203 downloads
Who Suffered Antitrust Injury in the the Microsoft Case?
Who Suffered Antitrust Injury in the Microsoft Case?, 69 George Washington L. Rev. 829 (2001), George Washington Law Review, Vol. 69, 2001
John E. Lopatka and
William H. Page
Penn State Law
and
University of Florida - Fredric G. Levin College of Law
Date Posted: May 30, 2009
Accepted Paper Series
39 downloads
Who Owns the Charles River Bridge? Intellectual Property and Competition in the Software Industry
UC Berkeley Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper No. 15
Robert P. Merges
University of California, Berkeley - School of Law
Date Posted: February 28, 2000
Working Paper Series
923 downloads
Who Must Fear the Brazilian Antitrust Authority? The Control of Cartels and Monopolies in Brazil During the Last 10 Years (1998-2007)
João Eduardo Gomide de Paula
,
Ademir Antonio Pereira Jr.
and
Gabriel Nascimento Pinto
University of Sao Paulo (USP)
,
University of Sao Paulo (USP)
and
University of Sao Paulo - Faculdade de Direito
Date Posted: April 17, 2008
Working Paper Series
160 downloads
Who Determines the Optimal Trade-Off between Quality and Price?
Loyola Consumer Law Review, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2002
Barbara Ann White
University of Baltimore - School of Law
Date Posted: June 12, 2010
Working Paper Series
28 downloads
Whither Dr. Miles?
Loyola Consumer Law Review, Vol. 20, No. 1, 2007
Mark D. Bauer
Stetson University - College of Law
Date Posted: August 28, 2007
Last Revised: August 21, 2012
Accepted Paper Series
231 downloads
Which Goals Count in Article 101 TFEU?: Public Policy and its Discontents
European Competition Law Review, 2011
Christopher Townley
King's College London
Date Posted: September 13, 2011
Last Revised: October 17, 2012
Accepted Paper Series
167 downloads
Which Cases are 'Such Cases': Interpreting and Applying Section 12 of the Clayton Act
Fordham Law Review, Vol. 76, p. 1177, 2007
Adam Perry
affiliation not provided to SSRN
Date Posted: November 28, 2007
Accepted Paper Series
33 downloads
Where do We Go Now? The Hatch-Waxman Act 25 Years Later: Successes, Failures, and Prescriptions for the Future
Rutgers Law Journal, Forthcoming, Lawyers, Drugs & Money Symposium, Lawyers, Drugs & Money: A Prescription for Antitrust Enforcement in the Pharmaceutical Industry
Linda M. Nussbaum
and
John Radice
Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP
and
Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP
Date Posted: January 09, 2010
Accepted Paper Series
76 downloads
When Should States Challenge Mergers: A Proposed Federal/State Balance
New York Law School Law Review, Vol. 35, No. 4, 1990
Robert H. Lande
University of Baltimore - School of Law
Date Posted: March 30, 2009
Accepted Paper Series
41 downloads
When Should a Case be Dismissed? The Economics of Pleading and Summary Judgment Standards
Boston Univ. School of Law Working Paper No. 06-06
Keith N. Hylton
Boston University
Date Posted: April 18, 2006
Working Paper Series
197 downloads
When Low is No Good: Predatory Pricing and US antitrust law (1950-1980)
European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, December 2011
Nicola Giocoli
University of Pisa
Date Posted: June 01, 2009
Last Revised: November 30, 2011
Accepted Paper Series
260 downloads
When is Static Analysis a Sufficient Proxy for Dynamic Considerations? Reconsidering Antitrust and Innovation
Joshua S. Gans
University of Toronto - Rotman School of Management
Date Posted: May 14, 2010
Working Paper Series
164 downloads
When Caught with Your Hand in the Cookie Jar...Argue Standing
Rutgers Law Journal, Forthcoming, Lawyers, Drugs & Money Symposium, Lawyers, Drugs & Money: A Prescription for Antitrust Enforcement in the Pharmaceutical Industry
Jay L. Himes
Labaton Sucharow LLP
Date Posted: January 15, 2010
Accepted Paper Series
86 downloads
When are Excessive Prices Unfair?
ESRC Centre for Competition Policy Working Paper No. 10-4
Pinar Akman
and
Luke Garrod
University of East Anglia (UEA) - Centre for Competition Policy
and
University of East Anglia - ESRC Centre for Competition Policy and School of Economics
Date Posted: May 14, 2010
Working Paper Series
95 downloads
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 5.641 seconds