Abstract

 
 

References (28)



 


 



The Direct Costs from NPE Disputes


James E. Bessen


Boston University - School of Law; Research on Innovation

Michael J. Meurer


Boston University - School of Law

June 28, 2012

Boston Univ. School of Law, Law and Economics Research Paper No. 12-34

Abstract:     
In the past, “non-practicing entities” (NPEs), popularly known as “patent trolls,” have helped small inventors profit from their inventions. Is this true today or, given the unprecedented levels of NPE litigation, do NPEs reduce innovation incentives? Using a survey of defendants and a database of litigation, this paper estimates the direct costs to defendants arising from NPE patent assertions. We estimate that firms accrued $29 billion of direct costs in 2011. Moreover, although large firms accrued over half of direct costs, most of the defendants were small or medium-sized firms, indicating that NPEs are not just a problem for large firms.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 36

Keywords: patent, litigation, litigation cost, non-practicing entities, software patents

JEL Classification: O31, O34, K41

working papers series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 25, 2012 ; Last revised: June 28, 2012

Suggested Citation

Bessen, James E. and Meurer, Michael J., The Direct Costs from NPE Disputes (June 28, 2012). Boston Univ. School of Law, Law and Economics Research Paper No. 12-34. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2091210 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2091210

Contact Information

James E. Bessen
Boston University - School of Law ( email )
765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
Research on Innovation ( email )
202 High Head Rd.
Harpswell, ME 04079
United States
617-531-2092 (Phone)
Michael J. Meurer (Contact Author)
Boston University - School of Law ( email )
765 Commonwealth Avenue
Boston, MA 02215
United States
617-353-6292 (Phone)
617-353-3077 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 22,085
Downloads: 3,256
Download Rank: 1,192
References:  28
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.469 seconds